Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> improvements pursuant to the a-rcement. Specifically, in the event the Successor Agency"s <br /> obligation to pay the Dees is triggered, the Successor Agency will be required to pay one percent <br /> ( 1%) of the estimated cost of construction of-the development for which the Dees are charged <br /> directly to the City and the Developer will make a loan to the Successor Agency equal to the <br /> remaining amount ofthe Fees ("Iec Loan"). The Fee Loan is required to be paid from and is <br /> secured by a pledge o1- lorlmer tax increment accruing front the Site (defined in the S.A. Venture <br /> Agreement). <br /> Although the specific development to which the Dees and the Fee Loan relate has not yet <br /> commenced, the Successor Agency"s obligation to pay the Fees and to borrow and repay the Fee <br /> Loan constitute one component ()fa broader, n-tultifaceted contractual arrangement between the <br /> Former Agency (now the Successor Agency) and the Developer. The Developer has expended <br /> significant moneys and taken substantial actions in reliance on the Former Agency's/Successor <br /> Agency"s obligation to perform its obligations under the S.A. Venture Agreement, including <br /> payment ol'the fees and repayment of the Fee Loan. <br /> The DOF has taken the position that'-Section 34163 (b) prohibits a redevelopment <br /> agency from incurring any obligations or making commitments after June 27, 201 1," The DOF <br /> further states, in the May 24 Letter, that the DOF believes "that commitments have not been <br /> (made for the $ 1.6 million JFees/Fee Loam and that this is an estimated amount for possible <br /> future projects." <br /> As an initial matter, Section 34163 is not applicable to the Successor Agency. <br /> Section 34163, cited by the DOI'_ does not mention successor agencies at all; instead, this section <br /> lists actions that former redevelopment agencies were prohibited from taking during the period <br /> between the passage of A13 I x 26 and February 1, 2012, the date all redevelopment agencies were <br /> dissolved." More fundamentally, the S.A. Venture Agreement and the Former Agency's <br /> obligation to pay the Fees in connection with specified future development pursuant to that <br /> agreement d0 not constitute new obligations or commitments of"the Former Agency or the <br /> Successor Agency. This obligation was set forth in the original Participation Apt reement, <br /> executed in 1984, and was amended in the Third Amendment to the Participation Agreement, <br /> executed in 1992 Long before the passage ofthC Dissolution Act and All 1484. <br /> Fvcn if- Part L8 governed the obligations and authority of Successor agencies, <br /> Section 34167, subdivisions (d)(5) and (1) clarify the California legislature's intent that <br /> obligations such as the S.A. Venture Agreement were intended to be honored in the dissolution <br /> process. Section 34167(d)(5) defines "cnlorceable obligation" to include 'JaIny legally binding <br /> and cnlorceable agreement pr contract that is not otherwise void as violating the debt limit or <br /> public policy." Section 34167(1) provides that "In]othing in this part shall he construed to <br /> interfere with a redevelopment agency's authority, pursuant to enforceable obligations as defined <br /> in this chapter. to ( I ) make payments due, (2) enforce existing covenants and obligations, or <br /> " Specilically_ Section 34163 states'-Notwithstanding Part I (commencin-, with Section 33000), Part 1.5 <br /> (conmmencin- with Section 34000), Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 34050)p, and Part 1.7 (commencing with <br /> Section 34100), or any other law, conrmencing on the eftective date of [Part 1 .8], un agcn<_y shall not have the <br /> authority to. and shall not, do any of the following: (b) linter into contracts with, incur obligations, or make <br /> commitments to, any entity for any purpose--_. ' Emphasis added. <br /> 3-29 <br />