My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55B - RESO - OPPOSE CA PROP 32
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
10/01/2012
>
55B - RESO - OPPOSE CA PROP 32
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 6:12:54 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 4:36:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
55B
Date
10/1/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br />OCTOBER 1, 2012 <br />TITLE: <br />RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO <br />CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 32 <br />ITY MANAGER <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />APPROVED <br />? As Recommended <br />? As Amended <br />? Ordinance on 1St Reading <br />? Ordinance on 2"d Reading <br />? Implementing Resolution <br />? Set Public Hearing For <br />CONTINUED TO <br />FILE NUMBER <br />Consider adopting a resolution opposing California Proposition 32. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The City Council has expressed an interest in declaring a position on Proposition 32, a State of <br />California initiative set for voter consideration on the 2012 General Election on November 6, <br />2012 ballot. <br />Proposition 32, referred to as the Political Contributions by Payroll Deduction. Contributions to <br />Candidate. Initiative Statute has been labeled as the "Stop Special Interest Money Now" <br />initiative that will all but eliminate the historic means of unions for collecting political funds <br />through payroll deductions. Proposition 32 ostensibly does the same for corporations, but <br />corporations rarely use payroll deductions to collect political funds, instead drawing such funds <br />from their profits, and that source of funding is deliberately left uncovered. Furthermore, if <br />approved, it is believed to dramatically undercut the ability of unions to champion and otherwise <br />support social and political causes of significance to working families and their quality of life. <br />The non-partisan League of Women Voters of California and Common Cause of California <br />groups have closely reviewed and strongly criticized Proposition 32, with the League of Women <br />Voters saying, "this initiative is not at all what it seems. Prop 32 promises 'political reform,' but <br />is really designed by its special-interest backers to help themselves and harm their opponents. <br />Despite its proponents' claims, it won't take money out of politics. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />There is no fiscal impact associated with this item <br />55B-1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.