My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10A - MINUTES - 10-01-2012
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
10/15/2012
>
10A - MINUTES - 10-01-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2012 4:20:55 PM
Creation date
10/11/2012 4:20:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
10A
Date
10/15/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that would create additional barriers to development process; indicated <br />that union not invited to participate in the development process of the <br />ordinance. <br />• Doug Mangione, representing IBEW 441, opposed to sunshine <br />ordinance. <br />• Rodney Larson, representing U.A., Local 582, spoke in opposition to <br />sunshine ordinance. <br />• Russ Nicholson, representing Plasters Local 200, opposed to sunshine <br />ordinance; high unemployment. <br />• Zeke Hermandez, representing Santa Ana LULAC #147, supports <br />sunshine ordinance that will provide transparency and open <br />government <br />• Jose Moreno, representing Santa Ana LULAC #147, supports <br />sunshine ordinance and transparency. <br />• Adriana Cuin & Yvette Ortega, representing Latino Health Access, <br />expressed support of sunshine ordinance and listed all organizations <br />supporting ordinance. <br />• Apolonio Cortes, supports sunshine ordinance. <br />• Jeff Dickman, supports sunshine ordinance; proposed City adopt <br />Lobbyist Registration similar to County of Orange. <br />• Sergio Hernandez, supports City adopting County of Orange Lobbyist <br />Registration; opined that pre-development meetings will not hinder <br />jobs. <br />• Ana Lydia Tutila, requested that pre-development meeting process <br />include response to comments made at meetings that is currently not <br />included in proposed ordinance. <br />• Manuela Lopez, requested after-hour meetings on pre-development <br />projects and translation services at all meetings. <br />• Madeleine Spencer, supports sunshine ordinance; noted that that City <br />of San Jose has open calendars on-line and has not been a problem; <br />ordinance would foster civic engagement. <br />• Laura Garibay, supports sunshine ordinance, SACReD has held over <br />34 meetings for the development of the ordinance; has out reached to <br />the Chamber of Commerce and other organizations. <br />• Keith Harkey, representing Ironworkers Local 433, opposed to <br />sunshine ordinance; obstacles in approval of development projects will <br />further hinder economy. <br />• Patrick Kelly, representing Teamsters Local 952, opposed to sunshine <br />ordinance. <br />City Attorney recapped provisions of Sunshine Ordinance. <br />Councilmembers thanked all for participation; requested top three bid <br />proposals to be posted on the City's website; site plan review comments <br />would be included written responses that would be included in approval <br />process; open calendars apply to elected and top executives alike - <br />remove the "summary of meeting" requirement on calendars. <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12 OCTOBER 1, 2012 <br />1 0A-12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.