Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2012 -02 <br />Site Plan Review No. 2012 -06 <br />November 13, 2012 <br />Page 6 <br />The proposed expansion is under the proposed threshold for maximum square footage build -out <br />as originally approved in 2002. Phase II of the approved master plan included a two- tiered <br />Phase II approach which included construction of the building expansion and the construction of a <br />four -level parking structure. Although Phase IIA originally contemplated the construction of the <br />parking structure prior to the Phase IIB museum expansion of the project, the current proposal is <br />found to be in conformity with the previously approved Specific Development as the DSC is <br />proposing an interim parking solution that satisfies the intent of the original approval while working <br />towards completion of Phase 1113 at a later date. Thus, the current proposal is the beginning of <br />Phase 11, but not the completion of the phase. <br />aLqn s <br />In 1998 the Discovery Science Center was granted a sign variance that created a special section <br />of the SD dealing specifically signs: Section 9 — Signage. The current application includes <br />proposals for signs that differ from those currently allowed by the SD, and that introduce sign <br />types, such as digital signs and rooftop inflatable signs, not currently addressed by the City's sign <br />ordinance. In order to give careful consideration to the proposed sign package, staff will be <br />processing this request separately and bringing it back before the Planning Commission at a future <br />date. This will be done pursuant to the existing language in the SD which requires Planning <br />Commission site plan review approval for all signs and /or modifications to signs. <br />Public Notification <br />The project site is located near the boundaries of the Park Santiago Neighborhood Association. <br />On October P, the DSC and staff presented the project to its board members and general <br />membership. The neighborhood inquired about the cube's lighting maintenance and had general <br />questions related to future exhibits. Overall, the expansion was well received. In addition, the <br />neighborhood contact of this organization was notified by mail 10 days prior to this public hearing. <br />The project site itself was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was <br />published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to property owners within <br />500 feet of the project site, as well as concerned citizens listed on the Permanent Notification List. <br />At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, had been received from <br />any members of the public. <br />CEQA Analysis <br />In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the recommended actions have <br />been determined to be adequately evaluated in the previously certified FEIR 96 -06 and subsequent <br />Addendum FEIR 96 -01 (ER00 -04) as per Section 15162 of the CEQA guidelines. The originally <br />certified Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addendum were analyzed in light of the <br />revised site plan and it is determined that there are no new significant impacts resulting from the <br />project, as proposed. All mitigation measures in FEIR96 -1 and subsequent Addendum continue to <br />apply to the proposed project. <br />