Laserfiche WebLink
VIETNAM 15 <br />A 2009 decree offers compensation, housing, and job training for individuals <br />displaced by development projects. However, there were widespread complaints, <br />including from the National Assembly, that compensation was inadequate or <br />delayed. There were also widespread reports of official corruption and a general <br />lack of transparency in the government's process of confiscating land and moving <br />citizens to make way for infrastructure projects. Some members of ethnic minority <br />groups in the Central and Northwest Highlands continued to complain that they <br />had not received proper compensation for land the government confiscated to <br />develop large- scale, state -owned enterprises. <br />For example, in February Pham Thanh Son self - immolated on the sidewalk outside <br />the Danang City People's Committee building to protest the confiscation of his <br />family's property by local officials and their refusal to hear his appeal. <br />On November 3, 50 to 70 police officers tried to remove an "illegal" sign, posted <br />weeks earlier on the roof of the Thai Ha church in Hanoi, which called on the <br />government to return land the church once owned. Security officials reportedly <br />injured one church member while attempting to crash through the front gate. On <br />December 2, security officials detained 30 parishioners and two clergy members, <br />including the head Thai Ha priest, after 150 -200 parishioners peacefully protested <br />for the land's return. By year's end all detainees were released. <br />In January, upon appeal, the Danang City People's Court commuted the sentences <br />of all the remaining defendants in a land - rights protest that led to police clashes <br />with Roman Catholic parishioners in a funeral procession in Con Dau Village in <br />May 2010 and set them free. Police had arrested six parishioners accused of <br />starting the altercation and damaging a police vehicle. The court initially tried <br />them in October 2010 for public disorder and denied three of them legal <br />representation; four individuals received nine- and 12 -month jail sentences, and the <br />remaining two defendants received suspended sentences. <br />L Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence <br />The law prohibits such actions, but the government did not respect these <br />prohibitions in practice. Household registration and block warden systems existed <br />for the surveillance of all citizens. Authorities focused particular attention on <br />persons suspected of being involved in unauthorized political or religious <br />activities. <br />