Laserfiche WebLink
single-tenant buildings that have visibility from the SR-55 <br />Freeway. Since the Brookhollow Office Park has <br />approximately 100 tenants with little or no visibility to the <br />freeway, the location and placement of these buildings <br />makes it difficult to identify the tenants. In order to allow the <br />major tenants to be distinguished from the other adjacent <br />structures, signage that is visible from the SR-55 Freeway is <br />necessary. The current limitation restricting the largest <br />monument signage to a maximum of 10 feet in height and 60 <br />square feet in size is not adequate given the developments <br />location adjacent to a freeway. <br />2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation <br />and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. <br />The granting of the variance is necessary for the <br />preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. <br />The larger monument sign will allow the office park the ability <br />to adequately identify the major tenants within the project. <br />Further, allowing the larger signage will allow the <br />Brookhollow Office Park to be competitive with similar uses <br />in the area. The signage will be consistent with Policy 2.2 of <br />the Land Use Element, which supports commercial uses to <br />accommodate the City's needs for services. <br />3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to <br />the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental <br />to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property as <br />the remaining signage will be in compliance with all aspects <br />of the Specific Development No. 8 (SD-8) zoning district. In <br />addition, the proposed signage will not generate any <br />operational impacts that will adversely affect surrounding <br />properties nor distract vehicles travelling on the Costa Mesa <br />(SR-55) Freeway. Finally, the signage will be designed to <br />comply with the provision of the California Building <br />Standards Code. <br />4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General <br />Plan of the City. <br />Finally, the granting of the variance will not adversely affect <br />the General Plan of the City since the proposed signage was <br />designed to be in conformance with the City's General Plan <br />goals and policies. For example, the signage is consistent <br />with Goal 2 to promote uses that enhance the City's <br />Resolution No. 2012-14 <br />31 B-14 Page 2 of 4