My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ZA FULL PACKET 2012-01-30
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Zoning Administrator (2009-Present)
>
2012
>
ZA FULL PACKET 2012-01-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2012 4:17:27 PM
Creation date
11/29/2012 4:15:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/30/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minor Exception No. 2011-02 <br />January 30, 2012 <br />Page 3 <br />A total of 555 parking spaces are required for the various office uses and massage school while <br />only 505 are provided. Section 41-632(3)(g) of the SAMC gives the City the ability to grant a <br />parking reduction through the minor exception process of up to a maximum of 20 percent of the <br />required parking spaces. As the proposed request is to allow a reduction of nine percent (50 <br />parking spaces}, a minor exception is the appropriate application for this project. <br />Minor exceptions from off-street parking requirements are governed by Section 41-638.1 of the <br />SAMC. Minor exceptions may be granted when it can be shown that the following can be <br />established: <br />• That the shared use of required parking stalls between two or more independent uses will not <br />result in a conflict between parking for one use and parking for another due to differences in time <br />of primary utilization of parking. <br />• That the granting of a minor exception will not substantially increase difficulties of vehicle <br />maneuverability or traffic congestion on the project site. <br />If these findings can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the minor exception. Conversely, the <br />inability to make these findings would result in a denial. Using this information staff has prepared the <br />following analysis, which, in turn farms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. In <br />analyzing the minor exception request, staff believes that the following findings of fact warrant <br />approval of the minor exception. <br />To analyze whether or not the number of existing parking spaces within the parking structure is <br />adequate to support the Schaal, CDM Smith, a traffic engineering firm, prepared a parking study far <br />the school. The study evaluated the parking patterns and demands of five existing NHI campuses <br />in California in order to identify an expected parking demand for the Santa Ana campus. Whereas <br />a typical shared parking analysis would analyze the various uses on the site to determine the peak <br />parking demand based on the different peak times of the different uses, this type of analysis was <br />not performed for the school because the building is dedicated to office uses. <br />NHI plans to offer similar educational services found at its existing campuses at the proposed <br />Santa Ana location. The CDM Smith parking study revealed that, based on an analysis of other <br />campuses such as the Emeryville and Studio City locations, which would be most similar to the <br />Santa Ana campus, the peak parking demand for the proposed school would be only 40 spaces. <br />The 40 spaces figure was derived by considering several factors: Identifying a student enrollment <br />factor of 63 percent, which is a consistent rate with their other campuses; using an attendance rate <br />of 80 percent; and considering alternate modes of transportation (carpools, transit, bike andlor <br />walk} that students are expected to reach campus. The projected 40 parking space demand would <br />be less than the 70 spaces available to the school for their use (Exhibit 5}. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.