|
EXHIBIT A of EXHIBIT 1
<br />SANTA ANA (ORANGE)
<br />RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (RODS 13-14A) - Notes (Optional)
<br />July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013
<br />DRAFT
<br />Item # Project Name / Debt Obligation Notes/Comments
<br />145 Project Costs for Item #144 This is the amount of the project and construction management related costs from February 1, 2012 through the completion of the project. Expenditures from
<br /> February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 for this item are part of the $8,467,780 in LMIHF expenditures identified in the LMIHF DDR and at the LMIHF DDR Meet
<br /> and Confer. The remaining amount to complete the project was identified and is pan of the $17,613,146 amount in the Housing Asset Transfer (HAT) Form
<br /> approved by DOF. However, DOF is demanding $54,241,958 in its LMIHF DDR Meet and Confer Final Determination letter dated December 26, 2012 which
<br /> includes the expenditures spent from February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 and the amount identified in the HAT. DOF has indicated a revised letter will be
<br /> sued to the Succesor Agency by early February 2013, but no such letter has been received as of this ROPS 13-14A submission date. Therefore, if DOF continues to
<br /> demand the $54,241,958 from the Successor Agency, then the amount shown under the RPTTF is required to complete the project. Otherwise, the amount under
<br /> Reserve Balance is appropriate.
<br />146 Station District Lawsuit Settlement This is the amount to be utilized pursuant to the Station District Lawsuit Settlement from February 1, 2012 through the completion of the required components.
<br /> There were no expenditures from February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 for this lawsuit settlement. The remaining amount to complete the required
<br /> components was identified and is part of the $17,613,146 amount in the Housing Asset Transfer (HAT) Form approved by DOF. However, DOF is demanding
<br /> $54,241,958 in its LMIHF DDR Meet and Confer Final Determination letter dated December 26, 2012 which includes the expenditures spent from February 1, 2012
<br /> through June 30, 2012 and the amount identified in the HAT. DOF has indicated a revised letter will be issued to the Succesor Agency by early February 2013, but
<br /> no such letter has been received as of this ROPS 13-14A submission date. Therefore, if DOF continues to demand the $54,241,958 from the Successor Agency,
<br /> then the amount shown under the RPTTF is required to be in compliance with the lawsuit settlement. Otherwise, the amount under Reserve Balance is
<br /> appropriate.
<br />147 Project Costs for Item #146 This is the amount of the project management related costs from February 1, 2012 through the completion of the required components. There were no
<br /> expenditures from February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 for this item. The LMIHF DDR listed $189,635 (of the total $30,593,530 in existing cash encumbered by
<br /> the five housing settlement agreements) needed to satisfy this obligation. However, DOF is demanding $54,241,958 in its LMIHF DDR Meet and Confer Final
<br /> Determination letter dated December 26, 2012 which includes the expenditures spent from February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 and the amount identified in
<br /> the HAT. DOF has indicated a revised letter will be issued to the Succesor Agency by early February 2013, but no such letter has been received as of this ROP513-
<br /> 14A submission date. Therefore, if DOF continues to demand the $54,241,958 from the Successor Agency, then the amount shown under the RPTTF is required.
<br /> Otherwise, the amount under Reserve Balance is appropriate.
<br />128-147 Housing DDAS and Project Costs Note: The Successor Agency is not requesting funds for these items from both the Reserve Balance and RPTTF funding source columns. The correct amount is only
<br /> one of these funding sources, depending on the revised LMIHF DDR Final Determination letter that DOF had previously indicated would be issued in early February
<br /> 2013. No such letter has been received as of this ROPS 13-14A submission date. Therefore, as the ROPS 13-14A form is a template with protected columns, rows,
<br /> and cells, the Reserve Balance column total OR RPTTF column total, and the Six-Month Total column amounts are incorrect and the Successor Agency cannot
<br /> change the formulas in the template.
<br />1-118 Various On the Prior Period Payments for Items 1-118 of ROPS 2, expenditures were incurred in the July through December 2012 period, but many invoices were not
<br /> received nor paid until after December 2012.
<br />3-19
|