Laserfiche WebLink
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO, C-2-1992 <br />ATTACHMENT <br />that do not pass the limit line for counting purposes during the count time <br />period shall also be counted as part of the quarter hour period in which they <br />occur. <br />c. TMCs, supplied by an alternate viable source, for an intersection that are <_ 2 <br />years of age may used in lieu of a manual count. <br />All counts shall be summarized in MS Excel 2007 format. Copies of the raw data <br />count sheets will be provided to each involved AGENCY. <br />Deliverables — Task 2: <br />1. Report summarizing data collection effort, including intersection turning counts, <br />traffic collision analysis, current traffic signal timing patterns, and drawings of <br />intersection features. <br />2. Electronic versions of all data files (See CTFP Guidelines for ROADS requirements) <br />3. Raw video footage of intersections receiving Video Counting to OCTA only. <br />4. Deliverables of Task 1 and Task 2 to AGENCIES shall be limited to political <br />boundaries. <br />Task 3: Field Review, Plans Specifications and Estimates, Design Standards and <br />Requirements <br />CONSULTANT shall review the geometric layout, existing traffic signal <br />equipment and signal synchronization related infrastructure, and identify any <br />deficiencies for each intersection and along the whole corridor. The review shall <br />include an assessment of the existing intersection geometry, traffic conditions, <br />and traffic signal control equipment and telemetry/interconnect facilities along the <br />corridor and of each intersection using observation, available as -built plans, <br />consultation with the local AGENCIES, and AGENCY supplied aerial photos. <br />CONSULTANT will use a standard field form developed by CONSULTANT for <br />this review that accounts for each piece of intersection data required. With <br />permission of the local AGENCIES, CONSULTANT will inspect the interior of <br />each traffic control cabinet, inspect the telemetry systems and determine their <br />respective `condition and make recommendations for equipment upgrades. <br />CONSULTANT is advised that certain infrastructure and equipment upgrades <br />have been identified previously by the AGENCIES and reviewed by the APM and <br />shall be a requirement of this project. These items are identified subsequently <br />within this document. <br />2. CONSULTANT shall also include an identification of all planned and programmed <br />improvements (widening projects, intersection improvements, etc.) on the study <br />corridor. The identification of these projects should be at minimum a list summarizing <br />all improvements. <br />3. Key components of the corridor review shall include, at minimum, the following: <br />