My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02 NEG AGRMT-REG TRANS CTR-HA PROP (CONT-2012-11-19)_2013-01-07
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Housing Authority (1999 - Present)
>
2013
>
01/07/2013
>
02 NEG AGRMT-REG TRANS CTR-HA PROP (CONT-2012-11-19)_2013-01-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2013 9:03:10 AM
Creation date
3/6/2013 2:14:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
3
Date
1/7/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exclusive Negotiating Agreement and <br />Keyser Marston Amendment <br />November 19, 2012 <br />Page 3 <br />changes that occurred as a result could not have been accomplished without the assistance of the <br />developer, and their willingness to assume the new obligations, while working with the Agency to <br />keep the project within the original budget. <br />To date, all requirements of the DDA as amended and Settlement are being implemented pursuant <br />to the. terms of said agreements. Construction of the new and rehabilitated rental units is <br />underway, with a lottery held this month (November) for the first of the units to come on line. Plans <br />for the for-sale units are being finalized with construction expected to commence early in 2013. As <br />called for the in agreement, the developer has incorporated the child care and retail spaces, which <br />are under construction in the 74-rental unit podium building. Additionally, staff facilitated a <br />connection with the County's Child Care Coordinator, whom the developer has been working with <br />on space design as well as identifying a provider. The developer is also working with staff to <br />commence the marketing and outreach for the retail space. An ad hoc public art committee was <br />established by the Agency with broad representation from the community involved in the Station <br />District outreach effort (Lacy Neighborhood President, business community representative from <br />Waterline Technologies, SACReD/Kennedy Commission representative, Santa Ana Council of Arts <br />and Culture President, CSUF Grand Central Arts Center representative, a Community <br />Redevelopment & Housing Commissioner, and a Planning Commissioner}. The developer worked <br />diligently with this committee to set criteria, issue an RFP and select an artist to design a sculpture <br />to be installed at the northwest corner of Lacy and Sixth Streets, near the retail space and across <br />from Garfield Elementary. At the committee's request, the developer made it a requirement for the <br />selected artist (Jules Rochielie) to involve the Garfield school children in the process. <br />The second predevelopment agreement focuses on planning and development of the SARTC and <br />larger Station District area. Since execution of this agreement, several planning efforts have been <br />undertaken in this regard which the developer has participated in, such asp the Transit Zoning <br />Code, SARTC master vision plan (which included a financial contribution by the developer), the <br />fixed guideway, and Santa Ana Boulevard grade separation studies. Thus, what remains to be <br />accomplished is a more comprehensive master plan focusing on the SARTC area. Additionally, <br />despite certain delays in implementation of this agreement due to the FOL lawsuit and being <br />hindered by the dissolution of redevelopment, implementation of this agreement has continued, <br />and specifically from City aspect since redevelopment dissolution. Staff and the developer have <br />been in on-going discussions with the County staff over the last two years working toward a <br />Memorandum of Understanding and an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement, which would include the <br />County, for the joint planning and development of our respective properties. Although County staff <br />notes the SARTC to be a "legacy project", they recently communicated a need to hold off on <br />formalizing any partnership arrangements due to a focus on internal real estate priorities first, <br />including developing a plan for the relocation of the Fruit Street Public Works operations located on <br />the subject County property. However, aCity/County working team will continue to discuss and <br />explore options for a joint planning and development effort. <br />Given that certain aspects of the original Predevelopment Agreement have changed since its <br />execution, it is recommended that it be fully revised and restated as an "Exclusive Negotiating <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.