My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
03/18/2013
>
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:28:57 PM
Creation date
3/14/2013 4:00:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
65A
Date
3/18/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
marijuana. Further, because it has no recognized medical purpose, marijuana may not <br />be prescribed by licensed physicians. <br />California voters approved the "Compassionate Use Act of 1996" ("CUA") Health & <br />Safety Code § 11362.5) which provides that state criminal sanctions shall not be <br />imposed against a qualified patient or the patient's primary caregiver, for possession or <br />cultivation of marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient, upon the <br />recommendation of a physician. <br />In 2003, the California Legislature enacted the "Medical Marijuana Program Act" <br />("MMPA") adding §§11362.7 - 11362.83 to the Health and Safety Code, to provide <br />uniform and consistent application of the CUA, provide for identification of qualified <br />patients and their primary caregivers through a voluntary identification card program, <br />and enhance access to medical marijuana through collective and cooperative cultivation <br />projects. <br />It is important to understand that neither the CUA nor the MMPA "legalize" marijuana. <br />They merely provide a limited defense to qualified patients and their primary caregivers <br />with respect to state criminal sanctions related to the possession, cultivation, <br />transportation and distribution of medical marijuana, when a physician has <br />recommended its use to treat a serious medical condition. <br />Last month the California Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of Riverside v. <br />Inland Empire Patient's Health and Wellness Center, Inc. (2011) 200 Cal. App. 4t 885. <br />The Court has been asked to determine whether local agencies are preempted, under <br />federal or state law, from regulating or banning the operation of medical marijuana <br />dispensaries and related activities. The Court will likely issue its decision before this <br />initiative is on the ballot. Depending on that decision, The City of Santa Ana may <br />decide to support this initiative, support the current ban on dispensaries, or propose a <br />competing initiative which more strictly regulates medical marijuana dispensaries in the <br />City. <br />Summary of Initiative <br />The Santa Ana Medical Cannabis Restriction and Limitation Initiative repeals the current <br />ban on medical marijuana dispensaries and replaces it with an administrative process <br />which will authorize at least twenty-two collectives and cooperatives to operate in Santa <br />Ana. <br />Section 3 of the initiative amends Article XIII of Chapter 18 of the Santa Ana Municipal <br />Code as follows: <br />1. Repeals the current prohibition of medical marijuana dispensaries, including <br />collectives and cooperatives, within the City of Santa Ana. <br />2. Requires the City to authorize a minimum of twenty-two (22) medical marijuana <br />collectives or cooperatives. The number of authorized collectives and <br />6 <br />65A-12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.