My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
03/18/2013
>
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:28:57 PM
Creation date
3/14/2013 4:00:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
65A
Date
3/18/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
businesses. One business closed to find a more suitable location because of the <br />nuisance activity and another in the same complex threatens to move out. <br />A business owner at this address writes: <br />"The smell is the primary issue, but other problems arise from having <br />such a business in our building. The "Clients" of the tenants tend to loiter <br />and leave trash in front of my unit. They all tend to be relatively younger <br />and most of them tend to dress in gangster style which is offensive for the <br />clients that I have." (Letter from business owner) <br />3. 826 N. Bristol St. - Officers respond to a complaint of prostitution activity. During <br />the investigation it is determined that the location is operating as a dispensary. <br />4. 1616 E. Fourth St., 1621 E. 17th St., 705 W. 17th St. - Burglary of dispensaries. <br />5. 1611 E. 17th St. - Business owner upset because two dispensaries are located <br />near her business and has seen an increase of graffiti, trash, and "weird" people. <br />Owner is deeply distressed and planning to move her business out of the city. <br />Initiative -Specific Impacts: <br />Section 18-610 (a) 3: establishes a purely ministerial process 2 which inhibits police <br />and code enforcement staff from acting proactively by leaving no room for additional <br />mitigation measures which would be designed to address known public safety and <br />public nuisance issues. The failure to address these foreseen and potentially <br />preventable issues will lead to increased Police Department and Code Enforcement <br />activity that, given existing resources, could impact services available to the rest of the <br />community. <br />Section 18-610 (a) 5_Lc): prohibits the Police Department and Code Enforcement and its <br />staff from using City resources to assist in the enforcement of federally controlled <br />substance laws to the extent they are inconsistent with California medical marijuana <br />laws. <br />Section 18-610 (a) 5 (d): prohibits the Police Department and Code Enforcement from <br />accepting Federal funding or participating in any task force that accepts Federal funding <br />` Ministerial duty refers to the official duty of a public officer or official wherein the officer or official has no room for the <br />exercise of discretion, and the performance being required by direct and positive command of the law. The powers and duties <br />of public officers or officials are, in general, classified as ministerial or d discretionary. The character of a duty as ministerial or <br />discretionary is to be determined by the nature of the act to be performed, and not by the office of the performer. Official duty <br />is ministerial when it is absolute, certain, and imperative, involving merely execution of a specific duty arising from fixed and <br />designated facts; that a necessity may exist for the ascertainment of those facts does not operate to convert the act into one <br />discretionary in its nature. <br />16 <br />65A-22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.