Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Holland & Knight Agreement <br /> April 1, 2013 <br /> Page 2 <br /> <br /> All seven proposals complied with the basic requirements of the RFP and therefore each firm was <br /> notified that their respective proposals qualified to be included in the interview rating panel process. <br /> <br /> On January 17, 2013, a three-member rating panel consisting of representatives from the Public <br /> Works Agency, Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency, and the Community <br /> Development Agency convened to review each of the proposals and rate them in accordance with <br /> the following criteria as set forth in RFP 12-075: <br /> <br /> 1. Responsiveness to the RFP <br /> 2. Implementation Plan <br /> 3. Experience of the Firm/Personnel <br /> 4. Cost of Proposal <br /> <br /> Proposals were rated individually by each panel member on the basis of a possible 100 points. <br /> Each proposal received a total score by adding points assigned by each of the three panelists, for <br /> a possible total of 300 points. At the conclusion of the meeting, the rating panel selected the top <br /> three proposals based upon the final scores: <br /> <br /> Consultant Firm Final Score Rankin Proposal <br /> Holland & Knight 261 1 <br /> The Ferguson Group 257 2 <br /> Patton Boggs 256 3 <br /> <br /> The top tier consultant firms were invited to participate in the oral interview process to allow staff to <br /> further assess their respective proposals. On February 26, 2013, the top tier consultant firms were <br /> interviewed by an oral interview selection panel consisting of the City's Acting Chief of Police, the <br /> Executive Director of Public Works, and the Executive Director of Government Relations for the <br /> Orange County Transportation Authority. <br /> <br /> Each consultant firm was allotted one-hour to give a presentation outlining their services and to <br /> answer questions from the selection panel members. The selection panel ranked the interviews <br /> and proposals based upon the following criteria detailed in the RFP: <br /> <br /> 1. Overall qualifications of proposed team and experience in the required areas. <br /> 2. Demonstrated prior experience with similar operations in the public/private sectors. <br /> 3. Project management acumen including ability to effectively work together with city staff, <br /> customers and stakeholders. <br /> 4. Oral communication/interpersonal skills. <br /> <br /> Similar to the rating panel process, proposals were rated individually by each oral interview <br /> selection panel member on the basis of a possible 100 points. Subsequently, each panel <br /> members' individual scores were tallied and totaled according to each proposal, for a total possible <br /> <br /> <br /> 25C-2 <br />