Laserfiche WebLink
BUSINESS CALENDAR <br />B. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATION DISCLOSURE (REGARDING AGENDIZED <br />None <br />' WORK STUDY SESSION <br />C. PREVIEW OF THE PROJECT LOCATED AT 1901 EAST FIRST STREET <br />Principal Planner Vince Fregoso provided the history of the site which had been <br />previously entitled for two 23-story residential towers with over 350 units. Mr. <br />Fregoso introduced Peter Zak, Senior Vice President with Lyon Communities. <br />Mr. Zak indicated that the property had been acquired by Lyon at the end of <br />September 2012, and that they have submitted a preliminary site plan review <br />package for the project with the Planning staff. He stated that the proposal before <br />the Commission is a residential building adjacent to an existing 3-story parking <br />structure. Mr. Zak indicated that there is ample parking for the proposed project <br />within the parking structure and would like the Commission's input on a phased <br />project with a future high rise product or a single phased project with all mid-rise <br />housing. He stated the high rise building was not feasible at this time. <br />Christopher Coe, with Coe Architects, provided an overview of the project site, which <br />proposes 196 units to be served by the existing parking garage structure. The <br />project would wrap the structure with units. Mr. Coe discussed the difficulty of <br />providing commercial uses at the ground level along 15t Street as required by the <br />' Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone. He also discussed the difficulty of designing <br />units attached to the parking structure along 15S Street due to the shallow setback. In <br />response to Commissioner Alderete, Mr. Coe compared the walking distance from <br />the garage to the units to the walking distance from the recently approved The <br />Marke project. <br />Commissioner Acosta voiced support for hiding the parking structure with units, but <br />had concerns with the three units facing 15S Street stating that they were too shallow <br />and close to the street and that he would prefer it to remain as open space. He also <br />stated that the decision to phase the project is best decided by the applicant. <br />Commissioner Yrarrazaval also was supportive of wrapping the structure with units, <br />but also had concerns about the units along the garage facing 1gt Street. He liked the <br />design of the open space along Cabrillo Park Drive. He had questions about the <br />ability to relocate the pool to the top of the parking structure were the second phase <br />to be built, as well as the ability to add another elevator to the parking structure. He <br />questioned the efficiency of having to build the pool twice. Mr. Coe answered that <br />the elevator cores were placed in the most efficient locations and that adding <br />another elevator would be cost prohibitive. Mr. Zak responded that the infrastructure <br />improvements needed to relocate the amenities to the garage deck would be <br />installed now. <br />' Commissioner Nalle clarified that finding a lender to finance the project with ahigh- <br />rise component was not feasible at this time. Mr. Zak confirmed that that was the <br />case. <br />Chairman Alderete stated that he would prefer to see the site planned for the mid- <br />rise and future high-rise, rather than being built out as one phase with all mid-rise <br />development. He commented the need to ensure excellent design for the interior <br />courtyards. He also stated the elevation articulation with 3-story and 5-story <br />interaction was appreciated. <br />Planning Commission Minutes 2 February 25, 2013 <br />