Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br />MAY 6, 2013 <br />TITLE: <br />PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION <br />AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF <br />A PORTION OF REAL PROPERTY AT <br />2909 S. BRISTOL (PROJECT NO. <br />063510 NON-GENE L FUND) <br />CITY A AGER <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />APPROVED <br />? As Recommended <br />? As Amended <br />? Ordinance on 151 Reading <br />? Ordinance on 2"a Reading <br />? Implementing Resolution <br />? Set Public Hearing For <br />CONTINUED TO <br />FILE NUMBER <br />Adopt a resolution authorizing the condemnation of a portion of the real property located at 2909 <br />South Bristol Street (APN 410-411-19) and declaring the public necessity and interest therefore. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The City is proposing to construct a new sewer lift station at the end of San Lorenzo Avenue, just <br />east of Bristol Street, as shown in Exhibit 1. To accommodate the construction of the lift station, <br />acquisition of 292 square feet of property located at 2909 South Bristol is required. <br />The public interest and necessity requires the proposed acquisition. A good faith offer was made to <br />the property owner on February 5, 2013, in an amount of $16,100 for the purchase of the property. <br />Negotiations continue with the property owner; however, in order to meet the project schedule, it is <br />necessary to commence eminent domain proceedings. Staff is requesting adoption of this <br />Resolution of Necessity and initiation of condemnation proceedings. <br />The sewer lift station will replace an existing lift station located beneath Bristol Street approximately <br />700 feet to the west of the proposed lift station. The new lift station will include updated equipment <br />and additional pumps to reduce the chance of sewer spills. <br />In its April 1, 2013 correspondence, the property ownership reiterates its objections to the adoption <br />of the Resolution of Necessity. The objections are premised on a variety of arguments that were <br />made to, and rejected by, the trial court during the CEQA litigation. Some of the claims raised by <br />the property owner are that the project poses significant environmental impacts, that the City failed <br />to review a reasonable range of alternatives to the project, that the technology chosen by the City <br />should be different, and that the cost of the proposed sewer lift station could be reduced if the City <br />instead opts for the installation of a submersible pump station. These claims have been addressed <br />by the City in its environmental review documents which were approved by the City Council on <br />February 21, 2012. Finally, the issues raised by the Lodge property ownership have been fully <br />litigated in the City's favor. <br />75A-1