Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br />PREPARED By Richard E. Lay _ <br />DATE 1OZ2 5 78 PHONE 834 -4900 <br />SUBJECT Ordinance <br />Revision of CATV Regulations <br />MS -N-L 1 <br />APPR <br />DEPIiTY CITY MAN A77RR <br />R. <br />2 <br />Y <br />DATE OF COUNCI L ACTION C. Iy %JP <br />It <br />-21TY MANAGER CLERK 6F THE C NCIL <br />RECOM W ND`rD AC[10N Place on first reading and authorize publication of title. <br />BACKGROUND CATV ( "Community Antenna Television "), also known as <br />"Cable Television ", is a system by which television signals are transmitted <br />to subscribers throughout a service area by cables running from a <br />central receiver, as an alternative to individual antenna reception. <br />CATV should be distinguished from the term "pay television" which <br />refers to a special charge for particular program or channel reception. <br />Both CATV and regular airwave television can provide "pay television" <br />programming, along with ordinary commercial channels. <br />State law authorizes cities to grant franchises for CATV systems, and <br />cities also have the inherant right to regulate the use of their <br />streets through franchises. Santa Ana adopted an ordinance regulating <br />CATV franchises in 1968 (Chapter 15, Article 2). No such franchise <br />has been granted, however, presumably because, until now, no CATV <br />operator considered it feasible to operate in an area which receives <br />quite adequate airwave reception. <br />Six Star Cablevision, Inc., however, represents that, due to advances <br />in CATV technology,CATV can be commercially successful even in major <br />broadcast areas such as the greater Los Angeles region. It hopes to <br />obtain franchises from many cities in the region, including Santa Ana. <br />The present City ordinance regulating CATV franchise is recommended <br />for revision for the following reasons: <br />1. It prohibits "pay television" programming. <br />This prohibition reflects the "Free Television" initiative of <br />1964, which was subsequently held unconstitutional on First Amendment <br />grounds. Pay television is now available by airwave transmission <br />through the "scrambler" technique. It also appears to be the major <br />commercial incentive for CATV in this area. <br />2. It requires the Council to fix subscriber rates through <br />periodic public hearings. <br />Such rate control is normal in areas where CATV is in a monopoly <br />position due to lack of airwave reception. In this area, however, <br />there is a multiplicity of airwave channels, VHF and UHF, including <br />specialty channels and "pay television." It appears more than likely <br />that competitive pressures from airwave television will require a CATV <br />operator to offer reasonable service at reasonable prices, without the <br />need for municipal regulation. <br />Furthermore, the City needs flexibility in drafting franchise grants <br />for CATV in the future, both because the technology of CATV is rapidly <br />developing, and because federal regulation of CATV is in a state of <br />great uncertainty and change. <br />�:UT!ON <br />J� Z <br />