My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Supporting Documentation
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
C
>
CABLE
>
Supporting Documentation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2014 12:26:13 PM
Creation date
5/22/2013 9:15:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CATV <br />Page 2 <br />community antenna operations and paid television, using the tv o words in <br />their classic sense. Pay television has generally been described as a <br />system whereby the signal is transmitted in a scrambled form and through <br />some device at the receiver is unscrambled to make the signal clear, whereas <br />CATV does not use the broadcast spectrum primarily, but used cable for the <br />purpose of distributing the signal to the receivers. Pay TV has separate <br />programs for which they charge. CATV picks up free programs and redistributes <br />those." <br />Arguments Against CATV. Those who argue against CATV systems summarize their <br />objections as follows: <br />1. A CATV system is the first step to-vard full- fledged Pay TV. <br />2. Outside TV stations are able to compete with stations in the community. <br />3. The master antenna system acts in competition with local radio and TV <br />dealers who sell and service individual antenna. <br />4. CATV cable networks add to the unsightly and anti- aesthetic aspect of <br />utility poles. <br />5. CATV con)panies do not help the local employment situation since they <br />bring construction people in from the outside and use equip-ment and <br />materials manufactured elsewhere. <br />The major sources of opposition are from three sources. First, the Tele- <br />vision Acce_sory Manufacturers Institute which is responsible for the pro- <br />duction of individual antenna units. The next source is the television <br />broadcasters and local television stations which allege that CE.TV syste.ns <br />bring outside channels and networks into the local area and thus compete <br />with their operations. And finally, the local radio and television dealers <br />themselves base their opposition on the fear that such a system would hinder <br />their operations. <br />Arguments for CATV. <br />1. It should be clarified that CATV equipment does not have the present <br />capacity to meter out TV reception as a true Pay TV system must do. <br />Pay TV does not depend on a CATV system for transmission of television <br />signals to the viewing public. Almost all telephone company pole <br />contracts, which are essential to CA�i -V, exclude the use of poles for <br />Pay TV purposes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.