|
SANTA ANA (ORANGE)
<br />RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS 13-14A) -- Notes (Optional)
<br />July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013
<br />Item # Project Name / Debt Obligation Notes/Comments
<br />89 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds Series A- Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #1), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line iterr
<br /> Indenture of Trust Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce;
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> invoices on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />90 2003 Tax Allocation Bonds Series A- Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #2), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line iterr
<br /> Indenture of Trust Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce;
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> invoices on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />91 2003 Tax Allocation Bonds Series B- Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #3), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line iterr
<br /> Indenture of Trust Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce:
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> invoices on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />92 Settlement Agreements - Housing See comments for Item #123.
<br />93 Settlement Agreement- S. Main See comments for Item #124.
<br /> Commercial Corridor
<br />94 Project Costs for Item #26 No longer applicable. See comments for Item #27.
<br />95 Project Costs for Item #28 No longer applicable. See comments for Item #29.
<br />96 Project Costs for Item #30 No longer applicable. See comments for Item #31.
<br />97 Project Costs for Item #35 Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #23), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line ite
<br /> Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce;
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> reports on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it i
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />98 Project Costs for Item #37 Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #19), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line ite
<br /> Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce;
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> reports on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it i
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />99 Project Costs for BARCO Agreement Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #18), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line ite
<br /> Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce:
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> reports on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it i
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />100 Project Costs for Auto Mall Dealers No longer applicable. See comments for Item #40.
<br /> Parking Lot Agreement
<br />101 Project Costs for Penske DDA Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #21), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line ite
<br /> Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce;
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> reports on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it i
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />102 Project Costs for CC&R Obligation Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #22), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line ite
<br /> Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce;
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> reports on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it i
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />103 Non-Housing Asset Maintenance & Actual amount spent in ROPS 2 period. This item was denied on ROPS 2 (line item #87), so it was included again on ROPS 3 (line ite
<br /> Disposition Confer Final Determination letter dated December 18, 2012 stated that "although Finance agrees that these items may be enforce;
<br /> administrative cost cap, the Agency did not provide documentation to demonstrate its position." Successor Agency staff provided
<br /> reports on January 14, 2013, and is awaiting an official response from DOF. Therefore, without a formal resolution on this item, it i
<br /> suggested in DOF's December 18, 2012 letter.
<br />104 Project Costs for Item #68 See comments for Item #129.
<br />105 DDA - Habitat for Humanity See comments for Item #130.
<br />106 Project Costs for Item #70 See comments for Item #131.
<br />107 Project Costs for Item #72 See comments for Item #133.
|