2013-001 SA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SANTA ANA (ORANGE) RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS 13-14A) -- Notes (Optional) July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 Item # Project Name / Debt Obligation Notes/Comments 132 DDA - Station District New Construction DOF suggested in its February 25, 2013 "clarification letter" on the Housing DDR that the Successor Agency designate "RPTTF" as tf enforceable obligation. However there is insufficient RPTTF to make the full amount of the payments owed and therefore these n Balance." Failure to make these payments in full or to try to recover amounts already paid from the developers who were entitlec the DDA, would place the Successor Agency in breach. The amount shown represents the amount that has been paid or remains tc required by the DDA (but which have been disallowed by DOF) from February 1, 2012 through the completion of the project. Expe 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 for this DDA are part of the $8,467,780 in LMIHF expenditures identified in the LMIHF DDR and at th Confer. The remaining amount to complete the project was identified and is part of the $17,613,146 amount shown on the Housin that was approved by DOF. Due to DOF's demand for the Successor Agency (Agency) to remit $55,270,598 (which amount does no expenditures made between February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 or additional sums required to be paid under the DDA), the A legal action. Until the dispute over the appropriate funding source can be resolved, the amount being claimed is shown under bot Balance, even though only one source is intended to be utilized. 133 Project Costs for Item #132 DOF suggested in its February 25, 2013 "clarification letter" on the Housing DDR that the Successor Agency designate "RPTTF" as U enforceable obligation. However there is insufficient RPTTF to make the full amount of the payments owed and therefore these n Balance." Failure to make these payments in full or to try to recover amounts already spent on these project costs would place th, of its obligation under the DDA. The amount shown represents the amount that has been paid or remains to be spent on project c disallowed by DOF) from February 1, 2012 through the completion of the project. Expenditures made from February 1, 2012 throu project costs are part of the $8,467,780 in LMIHF expenditures identified in the LMIHF DDR and at the LMIHF DDR Meet and Confer complete the project was identified and is part of the $17,613,146 amount shown on the Housing Asset Transfer (HAT) Form that v DOF's demand for the Successor Agency (Agency) to remit $55,270,598 (which amount does not take into account expenditures m? through June 30, 2012 or additional sums estimated to be required through the completion of the project), the Agency is being for, the dispute over the appropriate funding source can be resolved, the amount being claimed is shown under both the RPTTF and R only one source is intended to be utilized. DOF's letter dated February 25, 2013 approved this item as an enforceable obligation ar amount of $27,676 for the ROPS I period only. 134 DDA - Station District New Construction DOF suggested in its February 25, 2013 "clarification letter" on the Housing DDR that the Successor Agency designate "RPTTF" as tf enforceable obligation. However there is insufficient RPTTF to make the full amount of the payments owed and therefore these n Balance." Failure to make these payments in full or to try to recover amounts already paid from the developers who were entitlec the DDA, would place the Successor Agency in breach. The amount shown represents the amount that has been paid or remains tc required by the DDA (but which have been disallowed by DOF) from February 1, 2012 through the completion of the project. Expe 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 for this DDA are part of the $8,467,780 in LMIHF expenditures identified in the LMIHF DDR and at th Confer. The remaining amount to complete the project was identified and is part of the $17,613,146 amount shown on the Housin that was approved by DOF. Due to DOF's demand for the Successor Agency (Agency) to remit $55,270,598 (which amount does no expenditures made between February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 or additional sums required to be paid under the DDA), the A legal action. Until the dispute over the appropriate funding source can be resolved, the amount being claimed is shown under bot Balance, even though only one source is intended to be utilized. 135 Project Costs for Item #134 DOF suggested in its February 25, 2013 "clarification letter" on the Housing DDR that the Successor Agency designate "RPTTF" as tf enforceable obligation. However there is insufficient RPTTF to make the full amount of the payments owed and therefore these n Balance." Failure to make these payments in full or to try to recover amounts already spent on these project costs would place th of its obligation under the DDA. The amount shown represents the amount that has been paid or remains to be spent on project c disallowed by DOF) from February 1, 2012 through the completion of the project. Expenditures made from February 1, 2012 throu project casts are part of the $8,467,780 in LMIHF expenditures identified in the LMIHF DDR and at the LMIHF DDR Meet and Confer complete the project was identified and is part of the $17,613,146 amount shown on the Housing Asset Transfer (HAT) Form that v DOF's demand for the Successor Agency (Agency) to remit $55,270,598 (which amount does not take into account expenditures m: through June 30, 2012 or additional sums estimated to be required through the completion of the project), the Agency is being for, the dispute over the appropriate funding source can be resolved, the amount being claimed is shown under both the RPTTF and R only one source is intended to be utilized. 136 DDA - Station District New Construction DOF suggested in its February 25, 2013 "clarification letter" on the Housing DDR that the Successor Agency designate "RPTTF" as tt enforceable obligation. However there is insufficient RPTTF to make the full amount of the payments owed and therefore these n Balance." Failure to make these payments in full or to try to recover amounts already paid from the developers who were entitlec j the DDA, would place the Successor Agency in breach. The amount shown represents the amount that has been paid or remains tc required by the DDA (but which have been disallowed by DOF) from February 1, 2012 through the completion of the project. Expe 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 for this DDA are part of the $8,467,780 in LMIHF expenditures identified in the LMIHF DDR and at th Confer. The remaining amount to complete the project was identified and is part of the $17,613,146 amount shown on the Housin that was approved by DOF. Due to DOF's demand for the Successor Agency (Agency) to remit $55,270,598 (which amount does no expenditures made between February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 or additional sums required to be paid under the DDA), the A legal action. Until the dispute over the appropriate funding source can be resolved, the amount being claimed is shown under bot I Balance, even though only one source is intended to be utilized.