My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
20120522_ZA2012-06_1441WMacArthur
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
ZONING ADMINISTRATORS
>
2012
>
20120522_ZA2012-06_1441WMacArthur
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2013 5:19:35 PM
Creation date
6/17/2013 5:12:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
CUP2012-07
Date
5/22/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
concentration of alcohol licenses as a site that meets <br />any one of the following criteria: <br />The premise is located within 1,000 feet of <br />another existing off-premise license location; <br />2. The premise is located within 1,000 feet of any <br />property used as a school primarily attended by <br />minors, a church or a park; <br />3. The premise is determined to be over- <br />concentrated by the State Department of <br />Alcoholic Beverage Control. <br />Although the subject property is not within 1,000 feet of <br />a property used as a school primarily attended by <br />minors, a church, or a park, it is located within 1,000 <br />feet of another off-premise alcohol license and is in a <br />location determined to be over-concentrated by the <br />State. <br />5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any <br />specific plan of the City? <br />The proposed alcohol license will adversely affect the <br />General Plan in several ways. The new alcohol license <br />will be inconsistent with Policy 2.9 of the Land Use <br />Element which supports developments that create a <br />business environment that is safe and attractive. The <br />alcohol license increases the potential for nuisance <br />crimes such as loitering, disturbing the peace, graffiti <br />and other crimes that impact surrounding businesses <br />and residential neighborhoods. The granting of this <br />application is also inconsistent with Policies 5.1 and 5.b <br />of the Land Use Element of the General Plan which <br />discourages projects that are not compatible with <br />surrounding land uses and have the potentia! to <br />negatively impact their quality of life. The project's <br />proximity to multi-family residential properties to the <br />north and west further supports the denial of this <br />application. <br />E. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act the <br />recommended action is exempt from further review per Section <br />15061(b)(3), which is a general rule exemption applying to projects <br />that have no possibility of having a significant impact on the <br />Resolution No. 2012-06 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.