My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2013-08-05
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
08/05/2013
>
FULL PACKET_2013-08-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:20:22 PM
Creation date
8/1/2013 3:57:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
8/5/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1044
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana <br />Appendix A. Environmental Checklist <br />10 LAND USE AND PLANNING <br />Would the project: <br />a) Physically divide an established <br />community? <br />b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, <br />policy, or regulation of an agency with <br />jurisdiction over the project (including, but <br />not limited to the general plan, specific plan, <br />local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) <br />adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C) Conflict with any applicable habitat <br />conservation plan or natural community <br />conservation plan? <br />11 MINERAL RESOURCES <br />Would the project: <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a known <br />mineral resource that would be of value to <br />the region and the residents of the state? <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - <br />important mineral resource recovery site <br />delineated on a local general plan, specific <br />plan or other land use plan? <br />12 <br />a) <br />NOISE <br />Would the project result In <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of <br />noise levels in excess of standards <br />established in the local general plan or <br />noise ordinance, or applicable standards of <br />other agencies? <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of <br />excessive groundborne vibration or <br />groundborne noise levels? <br />A substantially permanent increase in <br />ambient noise levels In the project vicinity <br />above levels existing without the project? <br />The Met at South Coast Multi Family Residential project <br />Final Mitigated Negative Declaration— Addendum A -7 <br />75B -74 <br />June 3013 <br />W <br />538 <br />a <br />Jc <br />ISSUES: <br />j) <br />Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />10 LAND USE AND PLANNING <br />Would the project: <br />a) Physically divide an established <br />community? <br />b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, <br />policy, or regulation of an agency with <br />jurisdiction over the project (including, but <br />not limited to the general plan, specific plan, <br />local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) <br />adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C) Conflict with any applicable habitat <br />conservation plan or natural community <br />conservation plan? <br />11 MINERAL RESOURCES <br />Would the project: <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a known <br />mineral resource that would be of value to <br />the region and the residents of the state? <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - <br />important mineral resource recovery site <br />delineated on a local general plan, specific <br />plan or other land use plan? <br />12 <br />a) <br />NOISE <br />Would the project result In <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of <br />noise levels in excess of standards <br />established in the local general plan or <br />noise ordinance, or applicable standards of <br />other agencies? <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of <br />excessive groundborne vibration or <br />groundborne noise levels? <br />A substantially permanent increase in <br />ambient noise levels In the project vicinity <br />above levels existing without the project? <br />The Met at South Coast Multi Family Residential project <br />Final Mitigated Negative Declaration— Addendum A -7 <br />75B -74 <br />June 3013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.