Laserfiche WebLink
While respondents employed at the end of the 2008 calendar year rate their physical health <br />and mental health as better as indicated by mean ratings (M 3.43 for physical health and M= <br />3.90 for mental health) than those who were unemployed, (M= 3.18 and 3.77, respectively) <br />this difference is not statistically significant. <br />Table 3 -15 Ratings of Physical and Mental Health Among Follow -Up Survey <br />Respondents <br />Rating <br />Physical Health <br />1Vleutal Tiealth <br />Count Percent <br />Conk <br />1Percent <br />Poor <br />14 7.4% <br />5 <br />2.6% <br />Fair <br />25 13.2% <br />11 <br />5.8% <br />Good <br />78 41.3% <br />61 <br />32.3% <br />Veg Good <br />40 21.2% <br />52 <br />27.5% <br />Excellent <br />32 16.9% <br />60 <br />31.7% <br />a. Results from 189 baseline respondents who rated their physical and mental health. b. Three <br />respondents who declined to provide a response are not include here <br />One hundred and eighty seven follow -up survey respondents also indicated how many days <br />"During the past 30 days" their physical health was "Not good." Responses ranged from <br />zero days (n = 131; 70.1 %) to 30 (n = 13; 4.3 %), with a mean of 3.39 days, higher than that <br />observed at baseline (M= 2.47 days). Respondents who were employed at the end of the <br />calendar year report a lower number of days that their physical health was "Not good" (Af <br />= 2.76), than those who were unemployed (M = 3.63); a difference that is not statistically <br />significant, however. <br />Respondents also provided information on the number of days "During the past 30 days" <br />their mental health was "Not good." Responses ranged from zero days (n = 127; 69.4 %) to <br />30 days (n = 7; 3.8 %), with a mean number of 3.08, slightly higher than that observed at <br />baseline (2.95 days). Respondents who were unemployed at the end of the calendar year <br />report a higher number of days that their mental health was "Not good" (M= 3.12) than <br />those who were employed (M= 2.71), a difference that is not statistically significant. <br />Conclusion <br />The Return on Investment for services provided by Santa Ana WORK Center during the <br />calendar year 2008 is estimated to be 147 %. This represents a significant ROI given the <br />severe economic recession and increased costs incurred by the WORK Center from the <br />transition an "Integrated" model halfway through the calendar year. During the recession, <br />Santa Ana - Anaheim -Irvine metropolitan division unemployment has dramatically increased <br />while non -farm payroll significantly declined. The increased costs of operating the <br />Integrated model occurred because WORK Center participates now receive individualized <br />19F -310 <br />