My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19E - CONSOLIDATED PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
09/03/2013
>
19E - CONSOLIDATED PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2013 5:01:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2013 4:12:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
19E
Date
9/3/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> H. SELF-EVALUATION <br /> <br /> HUD requires that the City evaluate its annual accomplishments by comparing planned activities <br /> versus actual outcomes, and evaluate if progress was made toward meeting Consolidated Plan <br /> goals. To assist with this evaluation, HUD has suggested the City should consider the following <br /> questions: <br /> <br /> 1. Are activities and strategies making an impact on identified needs? <br /> Most activities funded with HUD and other public resources have m Q the report <br /> <br /> period. The following are examples: <br /> • The use of public funds helped to expand and preserve 96 ck by <br /> assisting 132 housing units during 2012-2013.9 The Ci rved via <br /> the inspection of 2,001 housing units for code viola <br /> • The City's CoC system continued to address the a City's and the <br /> region's homeless families and individuals. C of care carried out <br /> during the report period included outr, elessness prevention, <br /> emergency shelter, transitional housi• fusing. The needs of the <br /> <br /> homeless with special needs (e.g, ersons living with HIV/AIDS, <br /> and the chronic homeless) we s CoC system. These program <br /> efforts helped address prio ' consolidated Plan. <br /> • Various programs, Intl Act resources, addressed employment <br /> training and job pla `:ced Enterprise Zone and the City's business <br /> attraction and ret onomic opportunities to residents. <br /> • In order to m mmunity, the City supported public services and <br /> F <br /> public foci' ;fc services for lower income youth and seniors help <br /> stabili::. f _>5s such as recreation and nutrition programs. <br /> <br /> 2. W ribe the results? <br /> Comparin 'T accomplishments is one of the best means available to measure <br /> results of pro <br /> • The City did s one-year housing goals for the 2012-2013 program year (assistance for <br /> 42 units planne 22 assisted). Specifically, the City met 78.6% of its owner-occupied housing <br /> program goals but did not meet CDBG/HOME-funded rental housing goals - in fact no units <br /> were completed during the report period. (Note: over 100 HOME-assisted housing units are <br /> under construction and will be reported during the next report period.) If NSP and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 9 21 single-family owner occupied and 110 multi-family housing units were assisted during the report period. <br /> Additionally, 1 household received homebuyer assistance during the 2012-2013 report period. Total does not <br /> include eight units assisted with NSP funds during 2011-2012. <br /> o8/tu20U 30 <br /> <br /> 19E-38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.