FULL PACKET_2013-09-03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Finally, Table 4 provides a summary of "Resources" made available during the report period - including non -HUD funds. This table compares the source and amount of funds the City "Planned" to receive during the 2012 -2013 report period versus the amount actually received. TABLE 4 - 2012 -2013 PLANNED VERSUS ACTUAL RESOURCES Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $5,680,480 I $5,680,480 CDBG Program Income $0 $71,467 CDBG Prior Year Program Income $X <230 CDBG Reprogrammed Funds $660,000 $16,649 HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) minority ,117 American Dream Downpayment Initiative' AIDS Initiative 0,160 HOME Program Income $X $170,724 Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) $X $538,354 ESG Prior Year TOTAL $0 Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS f - - -� -,18 $1,548,618 Housing Opportunities for Persons With P _ �p $X 3 - - 8,999,669 - :— the City requested an extension to 9 /9/12. Santa Ana Redevelopment Fund - - $0 $X Cal Home a $660,000 $16,649 Ryan White Part P minority AIDS Initiative — - �I ing) $X $X 5UBTOTAL $X $X TOTAL $X $X 1. No new period; however the City did utilize prior year funds to carry out activities during 2012 -2013. 2. Anticipated — ,.,, a committed duringthe 12 -13 report period. 3. Prior Year Allo - :— the City requested an extension to 9 /9/12. 3. Progress TowlWiling Goals and Objectives As previously indicat d, EXHIBIT 4 provides a summary of the City's progress toward meeting five - year goals. Since 2012 -2013 was the City's third year of the 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan cycle, it is reasonable to set a 60% goal attainment rate as a test for program progress (i.e., at the end of three years programs should have already met approximately 60% of respective five -year goals). 08/11/2013 8 19E -16