My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - 1901 E FIRST ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
09/16/2013
>
75A - PH - 1901 E FIRST ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2016 4:11:52 PM
Creation date
9/12/2013 5:37:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
9/16/2013
Destruction Year
2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issues & Supporting Information Sources <br />I. Aesthetics —Would the project: <br />Environmental Checklist <br />CEQA Compliance <br />Less Than <br />Potentially SignificantWth Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant <br />Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br />A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, <br />trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />IN <br />state highway? <br />C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or <br />El <br />El <br />11 <br />quality of the site and its surroundings? <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />11 <br />El <br />❑ <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />the area? <br />11, Agricultural Resources — in determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are <br />significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land <br />Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation <br />as an optional model to use in assessing Impacts on agricultural farmland. Would the project: <br />A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or <br />Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non- <br />agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and <br />El <br />El <br />El <br />Monitoring Program in the California Resources <br />Agency, Department of Conservation maintains <br />detailed maps of these and other farmland categories) <br />B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a <br />11 <br />El <br />❑ <br />Williamson Contract? <br />C. Involve other changes in the existing environment <br />which, due to their location or nature, could individually <br />E] <br />El <br />E] <br />or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non- <br />agricultural use? <br />Ill. Air Quality — Where available, the significant criteria established by the applicable air quality <br />management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. <br />Would the project: <br />A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable Air <br />Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />Plan? <br />B. Violate any stationary source air quality standard or ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />Page 4 <br />75A -152 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.