My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES, DBA CPS HUMAN RESOURCES - 2013
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
C
>
COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES, DBA CPS HUMAN RESOURCES - 2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2014 12:54:56 PM
Creation date
9/24/2013 9:04:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES, DBA CPS HUMAN RESOURCES
Contract #
N-2013-131
Agency
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Expiration Date
6/30/2014
Insurance Exp Date
7/1/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Notes
Need executed original.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposal to the City of Santa Ana <br />Proposal to Provide a Management Compensation Study <br />• What are the percentage differentials between entry, journey, and advanced <br />journey levels, between supervisors and the highest level classification supervised, <br />and between managers and supervisors? <br />• Are the percentages aligned with best practices? <br />• Are the percentages applied consistently? <br />■ The fourth step is to apply recommended internal differentials within job families to build <br />the salary recommendations for classifications which have significant relationships to each <br />other because they are in the same job family. <br />■ The fifth step is to determine what classifications remain that are not benchmark <br />classifications and are also not part of a job series or family. These classifications are then <br />reviewed to determine: <br />• What classification(s) is the subject classification currently internally aligned with? <br />Where possible, efforts are made to determine why that current internal alignment <br />exists. The consultants carefully review this to ensure it is a reasonable placement <br />and if it is, the recommendation to maintain its current internal equity would be <br />made. <br />• If the current internal alignment is not considered to be reasonable, or no logic can <br />be found to determine why it is so placed, the consultants will conduct a review of <br />other classifications within the entire plan to determine what other classification <br />might be better used for internal alignment. Generally, the assessment is based <br />upon (i) the nature of work performed; (ii) the level of work performed; and (iii) the <br />minimum qualifications required. <br />The five steps are followed for each classification within the pay plan. A depiction of this work <br />flow process is presented in Appendix B. <br />Over the course of this analysis the salary recommendations are discussed with the City to ensure <br />the Project Team has the benefit of historic and relevant information on how classifications have <br />been paid in the past. The salary recommendations for each study classification will display the <br />following information: <br />• Classification title <br />• Current monthly range maximum <br />• Recommended monthly range maximum <br />• The percentage difference and /or dollar amount difference between the current and <br />recommended monthly range maximum <br />CPS HR�CONSULTING Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.