31A - CUP - 301 N SPURGEON ST - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CUP Nos. 2013-36, 2013-37 & 2013-38 September 23, 2013 Page 7 homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny theft, and motor vehicle theft, combined with all arrests for other crimes, both felonies and misdemeanors, except traffic citations. The Police Department then compares the number of such crimes in the reporting district as compared to the number of crimes in other reporting districts. In keeping with the standard used by ABC [Business and Professions Code Section 23948.4(a)(1)], should the Police Department determine that the reporting district has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number found in all reporting districts, the Police Department will consider this information in making its recommendation, which could result in a recommendation of denial. 301 North Spurgeon Street is located in Reporting District No. percent above the average reporting for all districts, which is established by the State for high crime. Conditions of approva SAMC that are adequate to address any concerns. Public Notification 185. This reporting district is 33 above the 20 percent threshold I are included as required by the The project site is located within the boundaries of the Downtown Neighborhood Association. Representatives from this Neighborhood Association were notified of this project. The project site was also posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, and a notice was published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners and tenants within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, had been received from any members of the public. CEQA Compliance In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act the recommended action is exempt from further review per Section 15061(b)(3), which is a general rule exemption applying to projects that have no possibility of having a significant impact on the environment. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2013-40 will be filed for this project. Conclusion Based on the analysis provided within this report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2013-36, 2013-37 and 2013-38 as conditioned. Wally Soboleske Associate Planner Sergio'Klbtz, AICP Principal Planner HS:jm hs:OMerc dokup13-361hru13-38 ElMerudo.po 31A-9