Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Eric A. Nelson <br />September 16, 2013 <br />Page 6 <br />LLG's prior field studies for LA Fitness and Spectrum Club concluded that larger <br />(greater than 30,000 SF), more "amenitized" health clubs have much lower parking <br />ratios compared to typical city code ratios. A review of floor plans of a currently <br />proposed 38,000 SF 24-Hour Fitness indicates that the ratio of "physical activity" <br />space to "ancillary floor area / space designated for amenities" is very similar to that <br />of the proposed Planet Fitness health/fitness club, as approximately 60 percent of the <br />floor area is allocated for "physical activity" while the remaining 40 percent of the <br />floor area is occupied by locker rooms, retail/reception area, storage, kids room, <br />office., circulation, etc.). Based on review of the Planet Fitness floor plan, <br />approximately 61 percent of the floor area (11,404 SF) is designated for "physical <br />activity", while the remaining 39 percent (7,196 SF) is allocated for ancillary uses <br />(i.e. locker rooms, storage/hallway, lobby, etc.). Hence, the use of an empirical ratio <br />of 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF for health/fitness clubs is applicable to the proposed Planet <br />Fitness project. <br />As can be seen from the following summary of peak parking rates (reflecting peak <br />parking conditions on a weekday), the empirical ratio of 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF <br />applied to Planet Fitness in the shared parking calculations is appropriate, yet <br />conservative design-level ratio based on the likelihood that actual parking needs may <br />be lower than anticipated: <br />City Code: 35.7 spaces per 1000 (or I space per 28 SF) <br />LA Fitness Studies: 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF E- used in this slimly <br />ITE Parking Generation. 5.27 spaces per 1,000 Sr <br />2009 24 hour Fitness Study: 5 spaces per 1,000 SF <br />(plus 17% contingency) <br />Spectrum Club Study: 4.50 spaces per 1,000 SF <br />2009 24 Hour Fitness Study: 4.28 spaces per 1,000 SF <br />(for UFC Gym) <br />Application of Shared Parking Methodology <br />Tables 3 and 4 presents the weekday and weekend parking demand profiles for Floral <br />Park Promenade based on the shared parking methodology, assuming full occupancy <br />of the center including ui 18,600 SF fitness club to be occupied by Planet Fitness, <br />Review of Tables 3 and 4 indicates that the future fill occupancy weekday peak <br />parking demands will occur at 6:00 PM with peak "design level" demands of 344 <br />spaces. Based on the existing parking supply of 366 spaces, the peak demand hours <br />on a weekday will yield a surplus of 22 spaces. On a weekend the peak parking <br />31 C-21