Laserfiche WebLink
CDBG FY 13 -14 Annual Action <br />Plan Substantial Amendments <br />November 4, 2013 <br />Page 2 <br />The City Council considered funding an additional project that was not on the proposed action <br />plan, but did not want to delay the submittal of the action plan. Therefore, the City Council gave <br />authority to the Finance, Economic Development and Technology Council Committee to research <br />the matter further. <br />In June, the Committee requested that staff review the amount of unencumbered prior year <br />CDBG funds available. City staff reconciled the fund, reserved an amount for future <br />contingencies, and determined that $750,000 could be used to fund additional CDBG - eligible <br />programs /projects. Due to the funding caps placed on the Administration /Planning and Public <br />Services categories, these funds must be used in other CDBG eligible categories. The <br />Committee requested staff return to them with a list of City projects in need of funding. <br />Based on the Committee direction, staff requested project proposals from City departments <br />where a list of capital projects was compiled and prioritized for the most in need of funding. <br />During this process, staff also communicated with the two non - profit organizations and requested <br />a list of projects for consideration. The Delhi Center submitted five projects and also indicated <br />that they were not currently collaborating with The Grain Project. After an eligibility and feasibility <br />review, one project from the five submitted from Delhi Center was determined to meet CDBG <br />requirements and have sufficient information to proceed. <br />In August 2013, staff presented the one non -city and the three City projects to the Committee. <br />Representatives from the Delhi Center were present and requested that they be considered for <br />funding. Additionally, a representative from The Grain Project indicated that she had been in <br />communication with the Delhi Center regarding project collaboration. The Committee directed <br />staff to work with the two organizations to identify any potential projects they were planning. The <br />three City projects and one non -city project are further described in the proposed Annual Action <br />Plan Substantial Amendment (Exhibit 1) and are listed in the table below for your review. <br />Project <br />Estimated Cost <br />El Salvador Park Improvement <br />$457,500 <br />Public Facilit Center tJ rades <br />$60,000 <br />Neighborhood Street Improvements <br />$242,000 <br />Delhi Center ADA Improvements <br />$200,000 <br />Total <br />$959,500 <br />Available <br />$750,000 <br />_Funding <br />Surplus / (Deficit) _ _ <br />j$209,500�__ <br />The Committee was informed that funding all of the suggested projects resulted in a deficit of <br />$209,500. Notwithstanding that fact, the Committee recommended that all four projects move <br />forward for consideration by the full City Council, where it will decide to either reduce funding for <br />29A -2 <br />