Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: <br />I. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported <br />by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" <br />answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does <br />not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No <br />Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project - specific factors as well as general <br />standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project - specific <br />screening analysis). <br />II. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, <br />cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational <br />impacts. <br />III. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If <br />there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is <br />required. <br />IV. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation <br />measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact". <br />The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to <br />a less than significant level. <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Potentially Unless Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />I. Aesthetics —Would the project: <br />A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ (�}rr( <br />B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited ❑ ❑ ❑ ��I ticc <br />to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings % <br />within a state highway? <br />C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character <br />or quality of the site and its surroundings? ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime views <br />in the area? ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />26 <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />and \msword \envcheck.doc \1.15.99 20 Page 1 of 10 <br />ri <br />