Laserfiche WebLink
buildings on the Erickson Property (including, if necessary, costs to abate asbestos - containing <br />materials in said buildings) by Vinci (the "Extraordinary Expenses "). <br />WHEREAS, the Agency and Vinci (erroneously referred to as Vinci Investments, Inc.) <br />entered into an Agreement for Acquisition of Leasehold Interest, Alcohol Beverage Control <br />Permit and Intangible Interest in Certain Real Property dated March 15, 2004 (the <br />"Agency/Vinci Purchase Agreement ") for the purchase by the Agency of the entire Mr. J's <br />Business, including Vinci's interest in the Erickson Lease (the "Erickson Leasehold "), the ABC <br />license, and all other tangible and intangible interests related to the Mr. J's Business immediately <br />after Vinci acquired these interests from the Joher Sellers. <br />WHEREAS, the Joher Sellers breached their agreement to sell the Mr. J's Assets to <br />Vinci, and Vinci initiated and prosecuted litigation against the Joher Sellers to compel <br />performance of the Joher Sellers' contractual obligations to Vinci under the Joher /Vinci Purchase <br />Agreement (the "Joker Litigation "). <br />WHEREAS, the Agency terminated the Agency /Vinci Purchase Agreement on <br />August 19, 2005. <br />WHEREAS, Vinci disagrees that the Agency properly terminated the AgencyNinci <br />Purchase Agreement. <br />WHEREAS, Vinci has now settled the Joher Litigation and acquired the Mr. J's Assets <br />(including the Mr. J's Business, all goodwill of Mr. J's and any actual or potential claims for <br />relocation benefits by the owners of the Mr. J's Business pursuant to the California Relocation <br />Assistance Law) from the Joher Sellers, debtor and debtor -in- possession in Case <br />No. SA 05- 14249 -RA and James J. Joseph, Chapter 11 Trustee ( "Trustee ") of the Bankruptcy <br />Estate of Mohammed Hussain Joher and Saher Joher, Case No. SA 0511201 -RA (the " Joher <br />Transferees "). <br />WHEREAS, the Agency and Vinci disagree as to the binding effect of the Tenn Sheet, <br />insofar as the Agency contends that the Tenn Sheet is merely a non- binding letter of intent. <br />Vinci contends that the Term Sheet, when coupled with the Agency /Vinci Purchase Agreement, <br />is a binding and legally enforceable contract which requires, among other things, that the Agency <br />execute a DDA and reimburse Vinci for its Extraordinary Expenses. <br />WHEREAS, the Agency and Vinci desire to resolve their differences and commence <br />non - binding negotiations for a DDA for the future development of the Erickson Property located <br />at 2101 and 2051 E. Edinger Avenue, Santa Ana, California, and the CRA's property (the "CRA <br />Property ") adjacent thereto (APN #402 - 101 -43). In connection therewith, the Agency is willing <br />to purchase certain of the Mr. J's Assets (as more particularly described below as the "Vinci <br />Property "); Vinci is willing to integrate the Leased Premises into the Honda Dealership and <br />make substantial improvements (as more particularly described below) to the Leased Premises <br />(the "Vinci Improvements "); the Agency is willing to contribute Three Hundred Sixty -Seven <br />Thousand Dollars ($367,000) to Vinci to partially offset the costs of the Vinci Improvements; the <br />Agency is willing to pay to Vinci Three Hundred Eighty -Five Thousand One Hundred Three <br />Dollars ($385,103) (subject to adjustments) as an advance against the Erickson Lease Subsidy); <br />-2- <br />600090435v6 <br />8 -116 <br />