2013-050 - Addendum to the Final Environment Imapct Report No. 2006-01

Home Browse Search

IN Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance Less Than Issues & Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significantwith Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact V. Cultural Resources —Would the project: A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance El El El adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? death involving: B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to define ❑ ❑ ❑ Section 15064.5? ❑ ❑ ❑ C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique El ❑ El evidence of a known fault? paleontological resource or site? 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ D. Disturb any human remains, Including those Interred El El ❑ E] El outside of formal cemeteries? liquefaction? VI. Geology and Soils— Would the project: A. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquisl- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the Slate ❑ ❑ ❑ Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Seismic - related ground failure, Including El E] El liquefaction? 4. Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the El El El loss of topsoil? C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique El 11 El geologic feature? D. Is the project located on strata or soil that Is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project ❑ El ❑ and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 6