My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-050 - Addendum to the Final Environment Imapct Report No. 2006-01
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2013
>
2013-050 - Addendum to the Final Environment Imapct Report No. 2006-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2013 9:30:51 AM
Creation date
11/6/2013 9:25:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2013-050
Date
10/21/2013
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r�� t Environmental Checklist <br />CEQA Compliance <br />X. Mineral Resources — Wouldtheproject: <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important <br />mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? <br />XI. Noise —Would the project result in: <br />Less Than <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Significanlwith <br />Mitigation <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Impact No Impact <br />project (including, but not limited to the general plan, <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) <br />adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />agencies? <br />environmental effect? <br />B. <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive <br />❑ <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels? <br />or natural community conservation plan? <br />C. <br />X. Mineral Resources — Wouldtheproject: <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important <br />mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? <br />Page 9 <br />XI. Noise —Would the project result in: <br />A. <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels In <br />excess of standards established in the local general <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other <br />agencies? <br />B. <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels? <br />C. <br />A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels <br />in the project vicinity above levels existing without the <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />project? <br />D. <br />A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient <br />noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />without project? <br />E. <br />For a project located within an airport land use plan or <br />where such a plan has not been adopted, within two <br />miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />project expose people residing or working in the project <br />area to excessive noise levels? <br />XII. Population and Housing — Would the project: <br />A. <br />Induce substantial population growth in an area, either <br />directly (for example, by proposing new homes and <br />F1 <br />El <br />13 <br />business) or indirectly (for example, through extension <br />of roads or other infrastructure)? <br />B. <br />Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ 19 <br />necessitating the construction of replacement housing <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.