Laserfiche WebLink
3. Considering adoption of the amendments to SD -59 requested by the <br />applicant, the project has been determined to be in compliance with <br />applicable parking, landscaping and architectural provisions <br />governing the project. <br />Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information <br />contained in the initial study and the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation <br />monitoring program, Environmental Review No. 2013 -14, prepared with respect to this <br />Project. The City Council has, as a result of its consideration and the evidence <br />presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the <br />California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") and the State CEQA Guidelines, a <br />mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program adequately addresses <br />the expected environmental impacts of this Project. On the basis of this review, the City <br />Council finds that there is no evidence from which it can be fairly argued that the Project <br />will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The City Council hereby <br />certifies and approves the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring <br />program and directs that the Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the <br />County Clerk of the County of Orange in the manner required by law. <br />Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ( "CCR ") § 735.5(c)(1), the City <br />Council has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence <br />that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources <br />or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project <br />exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding <br />buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code § 711.2 and <br />Title XIV, CCR § 735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not <br />required in conjunction with this project. <br />Section 3. The Housing Opportunity Ordinance, section 41 -1904 of the Santa Ana <br />Municipal Code, allows payment of a fee if substantial evidence supports that the cost of <br />providing inclusionary units on -site would substantially exceed the amount of the in -lieu <br />fee. The amount of the fee is based on the affordability gap associated with fulfilling the <br />required affordable housing units on site. With respect to The 301 residential development <br />project, the fee calculation is based on the affordability gap of $10,900 per unit, which <br />equates to a total in -lieu fee of $1,977,000, and by code requires payment prior to <br />issuance of a building permit for any portion of the project. After review and consideration <br />of this project, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the cost to provide the <br />inclusionary units on -site exceeds the amount of the calculated in -lieu fee. <br />The Housing Opportunity Ordinance, section 41 -1905 of the Santa Ana Municipal <br />Code, also requires that the City Council review and approve any Inclusionary Housing <br />Plan that includes alternatives to on -site units. <br />Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the public <br />hearing hereby approves: <br />Resolution No. 2013 -054 <br />Page 2 of 10 <br />