My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EXHIBIT 4-2_55A_BRISTOL WIDENING TECHNICAL STUDIES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
02/04/2014
>
EXHIBIT 4-2_55A_BRISTOL WIDENING TECHNICAL STUDIES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2014 7:46:43 AM
Creation date
1/29/2014 3:24:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Public Works
Item #
55A
Date
2/4/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 4.3 Noise Mitigation Measures <br />Noise Attenuation With Distance <br />In an area which is relatively flat and free of barriers, the <br />noise level resulting from a single "point source" of noise drops <br />by 6 decibels for each doubling of distance or 20 decibels for <br />each factor of ten in distance. This applies to fixed noise <br />sources such as industries, refrigeration/air conditioning units, <br />and bells or buzzers at schools. It also applies to individual <br />mobile noise sources such as an airplane, train or idling motor <br />vehicle. <br />For. a "line source" of noise, such as a heavily travelled road- <br />way, the noise level drops off by a nominal value of 3.0 decibels <br />for each doubling of distance between the noise source and noise <br />�~ receiver. Environmental conditions such as the wind direction <br />and speed, temperature gradients, the characteristics of the <br />ground (hard or soft) and the air (relative humidity), the pres- <br />ence of grass, shrubbery and trees combine to increase the actual <br />attenuation achieved outside of laboratory conditions to 4.5 <br />decibels per doubling of distance. However, for a "worst- case" <br />analysis, a 3.0 decibel reductiori with doubling was assumed for <br />arterials throughout this report. <br />General Methods to Reduce Acoustic Impacts <br />There are several basic techniques available to minimize the <br />adverse effects of noise on sensitive noise receivers. Classical <br />engineering principles suggest controlling the noise source when- <br />ever feasible and protecting the noise receptors when noise <br />source control measures are inadequate. <br />Many of the noise source control mechanisms are being applied by <br />State and Federal governments. Acoustic site planning, archi- <br />tectural design, acoustic construction techniques and the erec- <br />tion of noise barriers are all effective methods for reducing <br />noise impacts when sourcl control mechanisms are insufficient to <br />achieve desired results. <br />--------------------- <br />1. In its "Noise Assessment Guidelines ", the U.S. Department of <br />Housing and Urban Development uses a 4.5 decibel drop for <br />each doubling of distance in assessing roadway noise. Thus, <br />a noise level of 74.5 decibels at 50 feet from the highway <br />centerline would be attenuated naturally to 70.0 decibels at <br />100 feet, 65.5 decibels at 200 feet, 61.0 decibels at 400 <br />feet and so forth. <br />2. A more detailed discussion of available methods to reduce <br />noise impacts is included in the Appendix (refer to page <br />16). <br />4 -25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.