Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Miouel Pulido <br />Members of the City Council <br />February 1-3), 2013 <br />I'aae Two <br />3. <br />Paragraph L.(7} un:ler Miscellaneous Provisions, says that the C ity clues Ilot tivaltt any <br />contractors who are ass'ociattfd .iiih Prit_ife P,; rty Tl,,nr�uI1du (PPI'c) Vef tl.e r,;t, + <br />-J ,., /I , v ;�ei�,a Lu U al 11,Cl.3l <br />one operator, To F� Nlo, rvho is actively enga4ed in PPI's. None of the omitted companies <br />rcpresented in this letter, Caldwell's, .I&R, or Ton's, have clone any pi- cclatory or eruisiM l PPI's. <br />4. There are other instances where companies awvarded the contracts do not comply with <br />the RFQ. One of these companies. To & Mo, has sued people who 1 ?ave said derogaton, <br />comments about it. I suO -est the police department take a closer loos. at To & Mc) because we <br />beliove there has been cronyism, possibly nepotism, and possibly other violL:tions of the R-11=Q's <br />own requirements. In fact, the Santa Ana police: representatives told the rotational to" -III(" <br />companies. before the RFQ vas even sent out. that the departtaaent needed to add To <br />L. Mo. It <br />swas only after the towing companies protested that the police ,vent the RFQ route. <br />Based on all this, we do not believe the City has followed its oNv1I requiren?etits for the <br />R17Q, We believe that the process therefore has been unlawful and not in compliat ?ce with state <br />lary or the rules of the City of Santa Ana. As I stated in lily prior letter, the process appears to <br />have been a sham to favor one or tN� o con1pa1lics ot,er the C\istlll" Companies -who have screed <br />the city. <br />MY clients will suffer irreparable harm to their business if they are removed from the <br />rotational list. I1, reliance on the list, the) have spent hundreds of thousands of" dollars in <br />to,�vin�.� equipment and in Upgrading their storalge yards and dispatch systems. Caldtivell's and <br />J & R Towing will have to co out of business if they lose the contract. This is of supreme <br />importance to therti. <br />V+'e ask that t11e City Council take a look at the rotational towing operations and reject all <br />of the contracts, and start the process over, this time makinc sure that the actual rules are <br />followed. In the alternative, the City Council should demand that the current rotational towim, <br />list be maintained, on the theory that if it isn't broken, there shouldn't be such an effort to fix <br />In any evcnt. the poiice have said that the new list ,vii! take effect on February 25. My <br />clients will have to take sonic action to protect their rights and the integrity of the process if <br />nothing is done by then. <br />