My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - EIR -1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
03/04/2014
>
75A - PH - EIR -1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 5:04:05 PM
Creation date
2/27/2014 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
3/4/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Final EIR No. 2011 -01, VA No. 2012 -04 & VTTM No. 2012 -02 <br />February 10, 2014 <br />Page 6 <br />traffic, and utilities and service systems, In accordance with CEQA, a draft EIR was first circulated <br />for review and comment to public, local, regional and state agencies, and interested parties on July <br />27, 2011 for a 45 -day review period, On August 22, 2011 a public hearing was held on the <br />document in order to obtain input from interested members of the public. By the close of the 45 -day <br />review period, a total 28 written comment letters and eight verbal comments on the document were <br />received. A significant issue identified in several of the responses pertained to the potential eligibility <br />of the property for listing on the City's historical register. After analyzing the comment letters, staff <br />directed the EIR consultant to revise the Cultural Resources section of the document to reflect the <br />eligibility of the site as a historic resource. On December 1, 2011, the revised Cultural Resources <br />section was circulated for review and comment to public, local, regional and state agencies, and <br />interested parties for a 45 -day review period. At the end of this comment period, an additional 11 <br />comment letters were received, <br />On June 4, 2012, the City Council listed the site as a "Key" property on the City's Register of <br />Historical Properties. In response, the draft EIR was revised to reflect this designation as well as to <br />add a "Hybrid" alternative to the Alternatives section of the document. The draft EIR was <br />recirculated for review and comment to public, local, regional and state agencies, and interested <br />parties on November 1, 2012 for a 45 -day review period. On November 13, 2012 a public hearing <br />was held on the document in order to obtain input from interested members of the public. At the <br />close of the 45 -day review period, a total of 15 written and verbal comments on the document were <br />received. <br />The City has evaluated the comments received from persons or agencies that reviewed the EIR. <br />In accordance with CEQA, each public agency that commented on the draft EIR will be provided <br />with a response to its comments at least 10 days prior to the certification of the EIR. The <br />Responses to Comments document, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Draft EIR <br />constitute the Final EIR, was originally distributed at the January 28, 2013 Planning Commission <br />meeting. In addition; the Findings of Fact have been prepared for the project. <br />The EIR identified one unavoidable adverse impact associated with this project, which pertains to <br />cultural resources. The unavoidable cultural resource impact involves the demolition of the existing <br />residential structure and adjacent outbuilding and the removal of the approximately 250 orange trees <br />as this demolition would result in a significant adverse change due to the loss of a listed resource of <br />the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. As a result of the impact that cannot be mitigated to <br />a less than significant level, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations would be required <br />should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of the original 24 -unit project. A <br />Statement of Overriding Considerations is the process through which decision makers balance the <br />economic, legal, social, and technological or other benefits of the proposed project against its <br />unavoidable environmental impacts. However, the Historic Preservation Alternative, which was <br />prepared in December 2013 in response to the Responses to Comments, would result in a project <br />that is environmentally superior to the proposed 24 -unit development and would not require adoption <br />of a Statement of Overriding Considerations since the loss of a historically designated resource <br />would not occur (Exhibit 10), <br />75A -10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.