My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2014-03-04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
03/04/2014
>
FULL PACKET_2014-03-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 5:49:17 PM
Creation date
2/27/2014 5:41:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
3/4/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Albert Castillo asks if a gang injunction is planned for Townsend Street. Castillo read from a <br />statement regarding the OVC gang injunction. Orange PD used inconsistent standards; OCDA <br />did not provide information on what determines an active participant. These were young people <br />who had no record. <br />America Najera: 23 -year resident. She states the law criminalizes people because of generalizing <br />who is a gang member. Dividing and destroying our community. Consider better ways to help <br />the community, the gang injunction does not. Get the perspective of the people affected by it. <br />Gabriela Hernandez: part of a local and state -wide foundation that fights against criminalization <br />of community and youth. She identifies herself as a former gang member who turned her life <br />around due to the programs that were available. She now works as a therapist with at -risk youth. <br />She believes gang injunctions do not help, they have no statute of limitations; they only hurt <br />young people. She says probation and parole already deal with these problems. The net is so <br />wide, the injunction can affect anybody. The DA is going to pay over 3.3 million for attorney <br />fees to the ACLU, does not include the civil law firm that they have to hire to represent them in <br />the state and federal court system. <br />Carolyn Torres: gang injunctions violate a basic constitutional right for freedom of association, <br />movement, speech, and due process. Don't have faith in the OCDA to discern appropriate <br />procedure to put people on a gang injunction list and which activities are considered gang <br />activities. She expressed concern with the SAPD and the City's policy and procedures. Torres <br />had several questions: who the lead detective is and what Chief Rojas thinks of the injunction, <br />how long the DA collected evidence to prove the need for an injunction, was it submitted to a <br />judge, was it approved, who from the City Council is okay with the injunction and who is the <br />City Attorney? The mentality behind the Santa Nita injunction is not for safety. It was <br />supported by former council members Solorio and Claudia Alvarez. Torres states the need for <br />programs for the youth. <br />Vanessa Cerda: current resident on Townsend. They get "harassed" by the gang unit without <br />the gang injunction. Her partner is a former gang member who has been working and paying <br />taxes for the last five years. Trying to be successful and move on. No one asks the members of <br />the community how they feel about a gang injunction. She heard it from a community <br />organization. Need more resources. <br />Abraham Medina: here on behalf of Boys and Men of Color. Speaks about family members in <br />the area where they are proposing this injunction. He states there have been reports of police <br />13B -2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.