29B - REDFLEX AGMT EXPIRE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

hidden, activations which occur while police officers are conducting traffic control and activations which occur during inclement weather. If an incident clears the vendor it is then placed into a queue and a Santa Ana Police Officer examines the incident. The officer either accepts or rejects the incident based upon his /her judgment and application of the law. At this juncture, the officers reject many incidents if, in their opinion, they would not have issued a citation in the field. The officer often rejects incidents for reasons such as clarity of the picture, license plate is unclear, gender mismatch, invalid offense, safe turn on red, funeral procession, police controlled intersection, on or passed the limit line, unclear scene image, red -light not visible, sun glare or the driver is unidentifiable. In FY 2011 -12, 22,504 citations were filed with the courts and the department received $1,636,212 in court fines. In FY 2012 -13, 30,099 citations were filed and the department received $2,541,745 in fines. The total cost for a red light violation is $490. State legislation sets a mandatory fee for a red light violation (CVC 21453a) at $100 but additional pre - established "penalty and assessment" fees add an additional $390. The City of Santa Ana receives $153.71 for each violation, the County of Orange gets $101.69 and $234.60 goes to the State of California. These fees are not negotiable and cannot be adjusted. Operational Considerations Santa Ana experiences a significant increase in commuter traffic during the normal business week. With limited police resources, the system serves as a force multiplier to deal with serious traffic violations that present a danger to the public. Elimination of the Red Light Camera Program makes enforcement of red light violations more challenging and could potentially put the commuting public at greater risk. Legislative / Legal Considerations The most recent law to impact existing Automated Traffic Enforcement Systems was SB 1303, which was enacted on September 28, 2012. SB 1303 has two primary impacts: it addresses the admissibility of red -light camera- generated evidence and it adds certain requirements regarding the adoption of notices of non - liability, signage, and reporting on the effectiveness of Automated Traffic Enforcement Systems. The impact on the admissibility of photo enforcement evidence was addressed in two parts of SB 1303. First, there is now a presumption of authenticity applied to photo enforcement evidence. This changes the existing Evidence Code Section 1552 and 1553 to create a presumption of authenticity for printed representation of computer information and a presumption of authenticity for "a printed representation of images stored on a video or digital medium." Secondly, SB 1303 clarifies that photo enforcement evidence is not hearsay. SB 1303 amends Vehicle Code Section 21455.5 to state — "the printed representation of computer - generated information, video, or photographic images stored by an automated traffic enforcement system does not constitute an out -of- custody hearsay statement by a declarant. This amendment should eliminate hearsay challenges.