My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55D - RESO - SUPPORT AB 1453
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
03/18/2014
>
55D - RESO - SUPPORT AB 1453
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2014 2:39:11 PM
Creation date
3/13/2014 2:30:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Attorney's Office
Item #
55D
Date
3/18/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
That's why veteran cemetery advocates are seeking a state cemetery. <br />There are three state cemeteries open or in the works all in Northern and Central California, <br />including Fort Ord cemetery in Monterey that has been slow to launch because of a <br />requirement to set up an endowment to cover operations and burials costs. <br />Councilwoman Christina Shea had misgivings though about sending a signal that the city <br />could offer 100 acres of Great Park land, citing contractual agreements the city has with its <br />private development partner FivePoint Communities and legal restrictions on the land. <br />"I can't make a promise tonight that the Great Park will be the exact site," she said. Her <br />proposal to instead support the Assembly bill but call for a study looking at the costs and <br />land opportunities at the Great Park failed by a vote of 2 -3 with just Mayor Steven Choi <br />agreeing. While she spoke, a couple members of the crowd shouted back or loudly coughed. <br />And when she was done, there was silence - unlike the raucous applause after other city <br />council members spoke in support of the cemetery resolution. <br />Councilman Larry Agran who proposed the city's resolution of support Tuesday, said it was <br />possible to work with FivePoint and said they needed to move "very, very quickly" to seize <br />the moment at hand. "I think this bill is going to sail through the Assembly," Agran said <br />later. <br />A veterans' cemetery at the Great Park is far from a certainty. A public cemetery had been <br />included in early Great Park plans and would have been on property owned by developer <br />Heritage Fields - now FivePoint Communities. But in an amended agreement with the <br />developer, the cemetery was removed from its obligations. The developer also settled a <br />lawsuit with Forest Lawn after it nixed its cemetery plan. <br />A feng shui consultant the developer hired to assist in its home and residential <br />neighborhood design has said that a nearby cemetery could pose a problem for Asian <br />buyers. <br />In a letter to the Council, Brian Myers with FivePoint Communities reminded the city's <br />leaders of land -use restrictions relative to its development agreement and pointed out that <br />there had been no study of how a veteran cemetery would impact the park's plan before <br />Tuesday's meeting. <br />"However, we are willing to engage in a study process with the city for potential sites in the <br />city and the surrounding areas of the county," he wrote. <br />The bill would still need to make it first through the Committee on Veterans Affairs chaired <br />by Quirk - Silva, Committee on Appropriations, then the full Assembly and then the Senate <br />55D -14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.