My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 65A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
03/18/2014
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 65A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2014 5:03:46 PM
Creation date
3/18/2014 2:19:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
65A
Date
3/18/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mitre - Ramirez, Norma <br />From: Huizar, Maria <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 10:24 AM <br />Cc: Cavazos, David; Carvalho, Sonia R.; Rojas, Carlos <br />Subject: FW: Council Agenda Item 3/18/14, Five Year Strategic Plan <br />Correspondence received for your consideration regarding Strategic Plan. <br />From: Tim Rush [ mailto :timrushCalbhhscaprops.com1 <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 10:08 AM <br />To: Huizar, Maria <br />Subject: Council Agenda Item 3/18/14, Five Year Strategic Plan <br />Dear Mayor & Council; <br />I write to you today asking that you not approve the above referenced item that is before you this evening for <br />consideration. As I am in Nashville, TN on business I am unable to be there to share these comments in <br />person. There are many of your constituent groups who make up our cities long time residents and <br />stakeholders. Virtually none of them embrace the content of this document and what direction it would take us as a <br />community. <br />Of the 60+ neighborhood associations, the preservation /historic community, your local service clubs such as Rotary <br />& Kiwanis, I have had many conversations with long time residents who are shaking their head in wonderment over <br />the folly of this "plan ". <br />Quite simply this process has been dominated by one group to the exclusion of all others. SACRED does not speak <br />for me or for an overwhelming majority of your long time residents, current and former neighborhood leaders <br />etc. The Council must take a leadership role in providing a sustainable economic base and work with the business <br />community to see it thrive. And, to provide quality of life improvements to maintain and improve neighborhoods and <br />our community as a whole. We have observed over the past several years the questionable tactics of SACRED and <br />find it most disturbing. Not to mention many of their members don't even live in our city. <br />I ask you to cast your vote against this "plan" <br />Respectfully, <br />Timothy Rush, past president of Washington Square and Wilshire Square Neighborhoods, & former Comm -Link Board <br />Member. Neighborhood Hero Recipient 1999 <br />CCM 3118/2014 <br />65A <br />3/18/2014 1:24 PM <br />1:24 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.