Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013 -02 <br />February 24, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />Table 1: Surveyed Cities and Planned Sign Programs <br />city <br />Review Body <br />Nature <br />Brea <br />Planning Commission <br />Subject to a conditional use permit and reviewed on a case - <br />b -case basis to determine quality and site compatibility. <br />Costa <br />Zoning Administrator <br />Subject to a minor conditional use permit. Zoning <br />Mesa <br />Administrator must make findings related to quality and <br />context if the proposed signage deviates from the sign <br />standards. Sign program establishes design standards, not <br />message content. <br />Culver <br />Director (ministerial) <br />Director must find that proposed signage is warranted and <br />city <br />compatible with existing or proposed site development. <br />Fairfield <br />Director (ministerial), <br />Minimum number of tenants or size required. If no deviations <br />Zoning Administrator, or <br />proposed, director approves. Minor or major exceptions from <br />Planning Commission <br />the code require Zoning Administrator or Planning <br />Commission approval, respectively, <br />Huntington <br />Director (ministerial) <br />Minimum floor area required. Director must find that <br />Beach <br />proposed signage is compatible with existing or proposed <br />site development. <br />Newport <br />Zoning Administrator <br />Minimum site size, number of tenants, and/or frontage on a <br />Beach <br />public street required. Zoning Administrator must make <br />findings related to quality and context if the proposed <br />signage deviates from the sign standards. Sign program <br />establishes design standards, not message content. <br />Ontario <br />Zoning Administrator <br />Minimum site size and number of tenants required. Zoning <br />Administrator must make findings related to quality and <br />context if the proposed signage deviates from the sign <br />standards. <br />Roseville <br />Planning Commission <br />Required of all "regional mail" properties. Planning <br />Commission to review location, height, area, design, and <br />number to ensure site compatibility._ <br />The first component of the requested action is to create Section 41 -885 and establish standards of <br />approval for regional commercial centers and attractions. This section will contain definitions for <br />regional commercial centers and regional attractions, thereby setting minimum eligibility criteria for <br />such sites. <br />The proposed code amendments will also outline how and by whom applications for planned sign <br />programs for regional commercial centers and attractions may be submitted for Planning Commission <br />review. The proposed action will further amend the Sign Code to establish that such planned sign <br />program applications will be reviewed in a manner similar to that for conditional use permits, as <br />detailed in Sections 41 -633 through 41 -651 of the SAMC. The proposed amendments will also <br />establish findings of fact that the Planning Commission must make when deciding on applications for <br />75A -5 <br />