My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55C - RESO - BRISTOL ST IMPROVEMENTS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
05/06/2014
>
55C - RESO - BRISTOL ST IMPROVEMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2014 4:26:19 PM
Creation date
5/1/2014 4:23:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
55C
Date
5/6/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bristol Street Improvements, Right -of -Way Acquisitions, and <br />Adoption of an Addendum to the Final EIS /EIR <br />May 6, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />This recommendation does not allow the option of Bristol Coalition owners to remain in their <br />existing buildings. <br />B. Partial property acquisitions based on 120 -foot right -of -way <br />This alternative keeps some of the properties and building improvements which are non- <br />conforming, and limits the Bristol Street improvement and widening to a cross - section width of <br />120 feet. This alternative achieves the following: <br />o Consistent with the Bicycle Master Plan <br />• Reduces congestion (widens roadway from four to six lanes) <br />• Allows some Bristol businesses to stay (potentially at a net cost to Coalition members) <br />However, this alternative has significant concerns which include: <br />• Is not consistent with 1990 El <br />• Creates challenging street ingress /egress <br />• No on -site parking <br />• Non - conforming properties would remain and the level of non - conformity would be broader <br />• ROW constraints — the roadway alignment from phase to phase would not match <br />• Part -take compensation is insufficient for proposed Coalition improvements <br />• Bristol businesses along the subject segment are not united on this option <br />• Opposition from adjacent residents / neighbors including Washington Square <br />Neighborhood Association <br />RECENT DISCUSSION WITH BRISTOL PROPERTY OWNERS <br />City staff has continued to communicate with Bristol property owners. Recent conversations <br />have focused on how Bristol businesses may reinvest acquisition proceeds to relocate on Bristol <br />with a site plan and development which conforms to zoning and development standards including <br />the Bristol Specific Plan. The development standards and the process to accommodate potential <br />business relocation onto adjacent remnant properties and a response to coalition list of concerns <br />are included as Exhibits 5 and 6. However, the City cannot make any approvals at this time <br />since all discussions are theoretical. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Staff recommends Alternative A which achieves the OCTA and City goals. The focus of this <br />alternative is to build essential improvements on Bristol that bring superior aesthetics, adding to <br />the community's quality of life, and provide safer pedestrian mobility, enhancing access options <br />to the area. In addition, the improvements brought to the City via this alternative allow Bristol <br />businesses that wish to remain in Santa Ana to re- invest and relocate within the remnant parcels. <br />Lastly, this alternative is consistent with the 1990 EIR which was prepared with public input and <br />was approved by the City Council. <br />55C -3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.