Laserfiche WebLink
Bristol Street Improvements, Right -of -Way Acquisitions, and <br />Adoption of an Addendum to the Final EIS /EIR <br />May 6, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />This recommendation does not allow the option of Bristol Coalition owners to remain in their <br />existing buildings. <br />B. Partial property acquisitions based on 120 -foot right -of -way <br />This alternative keeps some of the properties and building improvements which are non- <br />conforming, and limits the Bristol Street improvement and widening to a cross - section width of <br />120 feet. This alternative achieves the following: <br />o Consistent with the Bicycle Master Plan <br />• Reduces congestion (widens roadway from four to six lanes) <br />• Allows some Bristol businesses to stay (potentially at a net cost to Coalition members) <br />However, this alternative has significant concerns which include: <br />• Is not consistent with 1990 El <br />• Creates challenging street ingress /egress <br />• No on -site parking <br />• Non - conforming properties would remain and the level of non - conformity would be broader <br />• ROW constraints — the roadway alignment from phase to phase would not match <br />• Part -take compensation is insufficient for proposed Coalition improvements <br />• Bristol businesses along the subject segment are not united on this option <br />• Opposition from adjacent residents / neighbors including Washington Square <br />Neighborhood Association <br />RECENT DISCUSSION WITH BRISTOL PROPERTY OWNERS <br />City staff has continued to communicate with Bristol property owners. Recent conversations <br />have focused on how Bristol businesses may reinvest acquisition proceeds to relocate on Bristol <br />with a site plan and development which conforms to zoning and development standards including <br />the Bristol Specific Plan. The development standards and the process to accommodate potential <br />business relocation onto adjacent remnant properties and a response to coalition list of concerns <br />are included as Exhibits 5 and 6. However, the City cannot make any approvals at this time <br />since all discussions are theoretical. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Staff recommends Alternative A which achieves the OCTA and City goals. The focus of this <br />alternative is to build essential improvements on Bristol that bring superior aesthetics, adding to <br />the community's quality of life, and provide safer pedestrian mobility, enhancing access options <br />to the area. In addition, the improvements brought to the City via this alternative allow Bristol <br />businesses that wish to remain in Santa Ana to re- invest and relocate within the remnant parcels. <br />Lastly, this alternative is consistent with the 1990 EIR which was prepared with public input and <br />was approved by the City Council. <br />55C -3 <br />