Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17" Street <br />f.) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community <br />Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? <br />The Project site is not located within a habitat conservation plan. Implementation of the proposed Project <br />would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.5 Cultural Resources <br />This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, <br />Subsection T - Cultural Resources, of the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR. <br />a.) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in <br />§15064.5? <br />A Historic Resources Evaluation Report (URS Corporation, 2012a) was prepared for the Project to <br />document identification, recordation, and evaluation efforts for architectural resources, such as buildings, <br />structures, objects, districts, and linear features within the Project area. The Historic Resources Evaluation <br />Report concludes with the finding that none of the properties within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) <br />appear to meet the criterion for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or California Register of <br />Historical Resources (CRHR). The historic -period properties within the APE also have been evaluated in <br />accordance with Section 15064.5(a)(2) -(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, using the criteria outlined in Section <br />5024.1 of the California Public Resources Code (CPRC), and do not appear to be historical resources for <br />purposes of CEQA. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than <br />previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />b.) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to <br />§ 15064.5? <br />Due to the limited area of disturbance, within an existing developed and urban area, and limited depth of <br />proposed excavations, the potential to uncover archaeological resources is considered low. However, <br />implementation of mitigation measures as included in the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR would <br />reduce impacts to archaeological resources yet uncovered or undiscovered. The proposed Project would <br />not result in archaeological impacts greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA (11/25/2013 REV2)132897 CM <br />55C -45 <br />PAGE <br />