2014-036 - Denying Appeal No. 2014-01 and Affirming Approval of Site Plan

Home Browse Search

4. The design and improvements of the proposed project will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The parcel map will not cause any environmental damage nor injure fish or wildlife as no fish or wildlife. The originally certified Environmental Impact Report were analyzed in light of the proposed project and it was determined that there are no new significant impacts resulting from the proposed project. 5. The design or improvements of the proposed project will not cause serious public health problems. No alterations are proposed to the development project that will lead to serious damage or create public health problems. The project was analyzed through the environmental review process to ensure that no environmental or health problems will be created. As a result, approval of the tentative parcel map will not affect the health or safety of persons residing in the vicinity. 6. The design or improvements of the proposed project will not conflict with the easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed project. Approval of the tentative parcel map will not create any conflicts with existing easements found on the site. As a condition of approval of the parcel map, conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC &Rs) will need to be recorded for this project. These CC &Rs will ensure that access, egress, and other necessary easements are maintained over the three parcels. Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the recommended actions have been determined to be adequately evaluated in the previously certified EIR No. 06 -02 as per Section 15162 of the CEQA guidelines. All mitigation measures in EIR No. 06 -02 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) requirements have been enforced and continue to apply to the proposed project. As required by the MMPR, a circulation and air quality analysis were performed to analyze any potential changes in either traffic or air quality as a result of the proposed development. The studies concluded that no additional significant impacts that would trigger the requirement for additional environmental review. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby denies Appeal No. 2014 -01, and affirms the Planning Commission's Resolution No. 2014 -036 Page 3 of 4