Laserfiche WebLink
Paul Guzman, resident, noted that he is in favor of the streetcar project. He advised <br />that he used to ride the Red Car to Los Angeles in the 1940s, but is now concerned <br />about construction costs; traffic congestion; realignment of streets; whether the <br />business community is in favor of the project. He emphasized that all stakeholders must <br />be in agreement, must look at the total picture, including demographics, in order to have <br />answers for those that may question the project. <br />George Pla of Cordoba Corporation said that this is a historical occasion for the city, is <br />very excited about the project, and appreciates staff support through the years, as this <br />was a great team effort. <br />AGENDA ITEMS <br />1. STREETCAR PROJECT — OUTREACH SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS; <br />SCHEDULE FOR ADOPTION OF THE LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE; <br />AND SCHEDULE FOR CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT <br />City Manager David Cavazos expressed his appreciation to the Council Committee and <br />meeting attendees. He provided a copy of the final draft of the EIR and AA to the <br />Committee members. He advised that in order to provide legal sufficiency and a <br />recommendation approval memo, the staff and legal counsel are completing a final <br />review of the documents. He noted that of the 15 cities in the country with the highest <br />population densities, only Santa Ana and Anaheim do not have a streetcar or light rail <br />system. <br />A brief background of the project was provided by Mr. Cavazos. The project started in <br />2006 with the OCTA Go Local program in a partnership of local cities to expand the <br />reach of Metrolink, and the streetcar would be the first project linking Metrolink. The <br />feasibility study was completed in 2007. The alternatives analysis was comprehensive <br />and encountered some issues related to bridges and the downtown area. Santa Ana <br />contributed $2.1 million to the project. Mr. Cavazos explained that the role of Santa Ana <br />in the MOU is to provide an accurate environmental report, and ensure the project is <br />ready to be transferred to OCTA. A locally preferred alternative will be selected by the <br />City Council. Santa Ana has been working closely with OCTA and public participation is <br />being sought. There will be strict adherence to the MOU. <br />The schedule for the environmental review was presented, and it is hoped that the <br />operations commitment, role of OCTA and outreach plan will be fully approved by the <br />City Council so that communications on behalf of the City are clear. The City's financial <br />commitment was noted, as were the next steps to be taken in the process. Once Santa <br />Ana fulfills its role, OCTA is responsible for financial planning, design, construction and <br />operation of the project. <br />Because this is a critical time for the project, the central point of contact will be the City <br />Manager. Prior to release of the final document, a memo from key City project staff and <br />consultants will be signed; OCTA will review the document; and will forward to the state <br />and then FTA will review. FTA will respond to OCTA, and the 45 -day review period of <br />Development & Transp. Council Committee Minutes 2 April 28, 2014 <br />