Laserfiche WebLink
• Action: TPA provided background and analysis of the measure to City staff. The <br />Mayor joined with other Big 10 Mayors to support the measure. TPA <br />communicated the City's position to the author, the City's representatives and <br />appropriate committee members. TPA also worked in a coalition with other <br />Orange County stakeholders in support of the measure. <br />• Status: The measure has been approved by the Senate and is currently working <br />through the committee process in the Assembly. <br />SB 1000 (Monning) — Sugar sweetened beverages safety warning. <br />o Action: TPA provided background and analysis of the measure to City staff. City <br />staff prepared a letter of support for consideration through City approval process. <br />o Status: The measure failed passage in the Assembly Health committee on a 7 -8 <br />vote (10 votes needed for passage). The measure is not eligible to be further <br />considered in the current legislative session, but may be reintroduced next year. <br />AB 981 (Bloom) /SB 1129 (Steinberg) /AB 2493 (Bloom) — Redevelopment dissolution <br />modifications. <br />• Action: TPA provided background and analysis of the measures to City staff. <br />• Status: AB 981 (Bloom) was approved by the Legislature last year, but was <br />ultimately vetoed by the Governor. As a result, Assemblyman Bloom <br />reintroduced the measure earlier this year as AB 2493. The author has been <br />working closely with the Department of Finance and the affected cities to craft a <br />measure that can be supported by the Administration and is helpful for cities with <br />outstanding 2011 RDA bonds. TPA continues to stay in close contact with the <br />authors' offices on these measures as they work with the Department of Finance <br />and the Administration in order to understand the potential impacts on the City. <br />Provide Information to City on Specific Requested Items — TPA has worked with the City to <br />provide information and analysis on a wide range of issues that have been brought to the City's <br />attention. Specific items include: <br />SB 7 (Steinberg) Analysis and Litigation Update — TPA worked with the City, and other <br />affected jurisdictions to oppose SB 7, which restricts state funding for charter cities with <br />charter provisions impacting prevailing wage, while it was considered by the Legislature <br />in 2013. Despite significant opposition from local governments across the state, the <br />measure was approved by the Legislature and signed by the Governor. TPA has also <br />kept City staff updated on the ongoing legal challenges to SB 7. A coalition of charter <br />cities have filed lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of SB 7 and the litigation (City of <br />El Centro v. Lanier) is currently pending in San Diego County Superior Court. <br />Emergency Drought Legislation — TPA met with City staff to provide information <br />regarding the potential items for inclusion in the emergency drought legislation, as well <br />as projects that the City might have which would be eligible for funding. Specific project <br />information, as well as overall policy principals, were provided to the City's legislative <br />representatives. <br />Medicinal Cannabis Legislation — TPA worked with the City to closely monitor numerous <br />pieces of legislation regarding the regulation of medicinal cannabis in 2013. TPA <br />worked with staff to analyze the potential impacts of these measures on the City. <br />Additionally, TPA worked with the City to draft letters of opposition to the measures and <br />ensure that the Orange County delegation, and other appropriate members of the <br />Legislature, were aware of the City's position on the measures. In 2014, TPA has <br />worked with City staff and Councilmembers to provide updates on evolving state <br />25P -5 <br />