My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55C - RESO - FIXED GUIDEWAY PROJECT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
08/05/2014
>
55C - RESO - FIXED GUIDEWAY PROJECT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2014 8:54:04 AM
Creation date
8/4/2014 8:51:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
55C
Date
8/5/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary ®f Public Outreach <br />Meaningful public engagement is an important component of the Santa Ana - Garden Grove <br />Fixed Guideway Project. From the outset of the project and throughout the process, the <br />cities shared information with and sought input from the community, elected officials, and <br />key stakeholders through meetings, dissemination of informational materials, a project <br />website. <br />In support of the environment review process and the 45 -day public review period for the <br />EA/DEIR, the cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove, in coordination with OCTA, conducted <br />three Public Review Meetings for the Santa Ana- Garden Grove Fixed Guideway EA /DEIR in <br />accordance with the requirements of CEQA. <br />The Public Review Meetings, held between June 14 and June 19, 2014, combined an <br />open house with a formal presentation and comment period, and provided members of the <br />community forums through which to comment on the EA /DEIR. Trilingual <br />(English /Spanish /Vietnamese) materials, interpretations and transcriptionists were available <br />at public meetings. Approximately 120 to 150 people attended the public meetings. The <br />following summarizes the comments received during the Public Review Period, (oral and <br />written) that are germane to the selection of the Locally Preferred Alternative. <br />• General community support for a streetcar system <br />• Concern about the duration and potential impacts of construction on local <br />Downtown businesses <br />• Concern about loss of on- street parking <br />• Interest in economic development stimulus in conjunction with the streetcar, <br />particularly on 5`h Street <br />• Expressed preferences for either 4`h Street or 5` Street. <br />Based on the results of the detailed technical evaluation of the alternatives, the findings of <br />the environmental review, and the comments received during the public review period, the <br />recommended Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) is Streetcar Alternative 1. The following <br />summarizes the key features of the LPA. <br />Technology (Mode): It is recommended that transit service be provided by modern <br />streetcars operating within existing streets in mixed -flow traffic (the streetcar will share <br />the travel lane with other vehicles), consistent with the Streetcar Alternatives analyzed in <br />the EA /DEIR. For planning purposes, the Siemens S70 short vehicle was assumed since it <br />is currently the only vehicle approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) <br />for streetcar operations in California. <br />LPA Decision Report <br />July 2014 <br />55C -18 <br />3 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.