Laserfiche WebLink
The following summarizes the results of applying the criteria and measures of effectiveness <br />to the reduced set of alternatives for the Santa Ana - Garden Grove Fixed Guideway <br />Corridor. A more detailed description of the detailed evaluation in provided in the <br />Alternatives Analysis Report (April 2014). Table 2 -3 summarizes the results of the results <br />of comparing each of the alternatives to the technical criteria and then ranking the <br />alternatives based on the results of the comparison. <br />Table 2 -3: Ranking of Alternatives Based on Detailed Evaluation Results <br />*For purposes of comparison to the Streetcar Alternatives, the Annualized Operating Cost for TSM includes <br />only the SARTC -to- Harbor route. <br />LPA Decision Report <br />July 2014 <br />55C -47 <br />2.171 Page <br />STREETCAR <br />STREETCAR <br />CRITERIA ( MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS <br />TSM <br />ALTERNATIVE 1 <br />ALTERNATIVE 2 <br />1. <br />ACCESSIBILITY AND LIVABILITY <br />No. of transit - dependent households within <br />1A <br />1/4 mile walking distance of proposed <br />3 <br />1 <br />2 <br />alignment <br />1 B <br />No. of daily riders (average weekday <br />2 <br />1 <br />3 <br />boardin s) <br />2 <br />_ <br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE LAND USE AND COMMUNITY <br />GOALS <br />Assessment of the transit supportiveness <br />_ <br />2A <br />of land uses served by the proposed <br />2 <br />1 <br />3 <br />alignment <br />Assessment of the economic development <br />213 <br />potential of land uses served by the <br />3 <br />1 <br />2 <br />ro osed alignment._ <br />2C <br />Community support <br />TBD <br />-- <br />3. <br />--- - - -- -- - - - - - -- ------------------------- <br />ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY <br />3A <br />Amount of additional right -of -way require <br />2 3 <br />3B <br />Environmental Tradeoffs 1 <br />2 3 <br />4. <br />TRAVEL BENEFITS, CHOICE AND RELIABILITY <br />4A <br />Customer service (travel times between 0- 2 1 3 <br />D pairs) _ _ <br />4B <br />Number of daily riders (average weekday 2 1 3 <br />_ <br />boardin s) <br />_ <br />6 <br />EFFECTIVENESS AND FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY <br />_ <br />5A <br />_COST <br />Con_ s_ tructability /eas_e_of_construction <br />1 <br />2 <br />513 <br />Capital cost <br />1 <br />2 <br />__3 _ <br />3 <br />_ _ <br />cost per route mile <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />__5C <br />5D <br />_Capital <br />Annualized operating cost* <br />1 <br />_ <br />2 <br />3 <br />5E <br />Operating hour <br />2 <br />2 <br />_cost _per <br />OVERALL RANKING <br />2 <br />1 <br />_ <br />3 <br />*For purposes of comparison to the Streetcar Alternatives, the Annualized Operating Cost for TSM includes <br />only the SARTC -to- Harbor route. <br />LPA Decision Report <br />July 2014 <br />55C -47 <br />2.171 Page <br />