Laserfiche WebLink
Mitre - Ramirez, Norma <br />From: Huizar, Maria <br />Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:48 PM <br />To: Haluza, Karen <br />Cc: Carvalho, Sonia R.; Cavazos, David; Mitre - Ramirez, Norma; Trujillo, Rose Ann <br />Subject: City Council agenda: 45 day Moratorium on recycling businesses & 3307 SOUTH MAIN <br />ST. <br />Attachments: Stop Recycling Flyer.pdf; 3307 S Main, SA_Brochure.pdf; OrangeLeftC55011195.pdf <br />Categorises: CA Correspondence <br />The following correspondence has been received on Agenda Item 50A. <br />Letter has been entered into the record. Thank you. <br />From: Magallon, Becky <br />Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:46 PM <br />To: Huizar, Maria <br />Subject: FW: City Council agenda: 45 day Moratorium on recycling businesses & 3307 SOUTH MAIN ST. <br />Maria, <br />I'm forwarding an email that the Council received regarding an item on tonight's Council agenda. <br />Becky Magallon <br />Executive Assistant <br />City Manager's Office <br />From: Jack Haley [mailto:JHaley @lee- associates.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 11:34 AM <br />To: Sarmiento, Vince; Pulido, Miguel; Martinez, Michele; Amezcua, Angelica; Benavides, David; Reyna, Roman; Tinajero, <br />Sal <br />Cc: Cavazos, David; Chuck Hardy; Greg Diab <br />Subject: City Council agenda: 45 day Moratorium on recycling businesses & 3307 SOUTH MAIN ST. <br />Dear City Councilmen and Councilwomen: <br />As someone that has represented local business owners for the past 25 years and as a current member of the Board of <br />Directors of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce, I urge you to vote no on the Ordinance 45 day Moratorium on <br />tonight's agenda (Item 50A) <br />This ordinance is a perfect example of how Santa Ana has gotten a reputation of not being business friendly <br />and isn't consistent with the goals you have supported to improve the Santa Ana business environment. <br />This ordinance is using a canon to "blow up' all recycling projects in order to address a single project that is <br />proposing a light recycling use on the questionable basis of being incompatible with adjacent land uses. This <br />use does not create the exaggerated impacts cited by city staff in justifying this ordinance, yet will create <br />substantial financial loss to the business owner and the property owners who relied on the city's zoning. It will <br />cause this business to leave the city. <br />CCM 08/05/2014 <br />50A <br />